Add mapToVoid operator

[danshevluk]

After fixing a mapToValue operator I got an idea to add mapToVoid operator. It's the most common use case for mapping publisher to a constant value. For example if you subscribe to NotificationCenter publisher and do not care about the value it produces:

NotificationCenter.default.publisher(for: UIApplication.userDidTakeScreenshotNotification)
    .mapToVoid()
   .sink {
       // Do something
   }

[freak4pc]

Hey, thanks for the idea !
I'm not entirely sure this operator is worthwhile.

map { _ in }
mapToVoid()
mapToValue(())

We're not really saving so much letter count with this very specific method.
If there's more demand for it we can happily add it, but otherwise It seems like something that might be better off as a specific extension to some codebase.

WDYT?

[danshevluk]

@freak4pc

I had something similar in most projects that I worked on, so it feels like a common thing to use. I agree that it's not saving much letter space, but the main purpose of this extension is to explicitly mark muting the upstream.

Practical example. Imagine that you want to refresh some app data in one of 4 cases:

• data model updated
• refresh control triggered
• if some timer passed
• if the app became active

Here is how I would implement this using mapToVoid(). Looks cleaner than with .map { _ in } or mapToValue(())

Publishers.Merge4(
   $addressInfo.removeDuplicates().mapToVoid(),
   refreshControlPublisher.mapToVoid(),
   refreshTimerPublisher.mapToVoid(),
   NotificationCenter.default.publisher(for: UIApplication.didBecomeActiveNotification).mapToVoid()
)
// Published value type here is Void
.throttle(for: 4, scheduler: DispatchQueue.main, latest: true)
.sink {
   // schedule app data refresh
}
.store(in: &cancellables)

Is's more of a convenience method, but I feel like it's a good fit for CombineExt. Your call! 😃

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #129 (aac9bde) into main (38a4d4c) will increase coverage by 0.04%.
The diff coverage is 94.59%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #129      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   95.50%   95.55%   +0.04%     
==========================================
  Files          68       68              
  Lines        3781     3866      +85     
==========================================
+ Hits         3611     3694      +83     
- Misses        170      172       +2     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
Tests/MapToValueTests.swift	97.75% <94.28%> (-2.25%)	⬇️
Sources/Operators/MapToValue.swift	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
Sources/Operators/ZipMany.swift	100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
Sources/Operators/CombineLatestMany.swift	100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
Tests/ZipManyTests.swift	97.20% <0.00%> (+0.18%)	⬆️
Tests/CombineLatestManyTests.swift	97.65% <0.00%> (+0.24%)	⬆️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 38a4d4c...aac9bde. Read the comment docs.

[freak4pc]

I'll go for it :) one fix

[danshevluk]

@freak4pc do you have any further suggestions? To me looks like it's good to merge, can you do that? 🙏