Update SLE 12/15 rule and change package name

[rumch-se]

Description:

• The PR renames rules and package name for SLE 12/15 and updates CIS profiles

Rationale:

• Instead of libaudit the current version of the rule uses audit-libs

[openshift-ci]

Hi @rumch-se. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a ComplianceAsCode member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[github-actions]

This datastream diff is auto generated by the check Compare DS/Generate Diff

Click here to see the full diff

New content has different text for rule 'xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_rule_package_audit-libs_installed'.%0A--- xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_rule_package_audit-libs_installed%0A+++ xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_rule_package_audit-libs_installed%0A@@ -1,9 +1,9 @@%0A %0A [title]:%0A-Ensure the audit-libs package as a part of audit Subsystem is Installed%0A+Ensure the libaudit package as a part of audit Subsystem is Installed%0A %0A [description]:%0A-The audit-libs package should be installed.%0A+The libaudit package should be installed.%0A %0A [reference]:%0A BP28(R50)%0A%0AOCIL for rule 'xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_rule_package_audit-libs_installed' differs.%0A--- ocil:ssg-package_audit-libs_installed_ocil:questionnaire:1%0A+++ ocil:ssg-package_audit-libs_installed_ocil:questionnaire:1%0A@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@%0A-Run the following command to determine if the audit-libs package is installed: $ rpm -q audit-libs%0A-      Is it the case that the audit package is not installed?%0A+Run the following command to determine if the libaudit package is installed: $ rpm -q libaudit%0A+      Is it the case that the libaudit package is not installed?%0A       

[github-actions]

Start a new ephemeral environment with changes proposed in this pull request:

sle12 (from CTF) Environment (using Fedora as testing environment)

Fedora Testing Environment

Oracle Linux 8 Environment

[marcusburghardt]

It is not a good idea to rename an existing rule:
https://complianceascode.readthedocs.io/en/latest/manual/developer/06_contributing_with_content.html#agreements

You should create a new rule if a new name is indeed necessary.
Otherwise, I would recommend to keep the existing name and use Jinja2 in the rule description.
But since this rule is restricted to sle products. It should be fine to simply rename the "package" on it.

[teacup-on-rockingchair]

Agree on this point 👍 if only the package name is changed it would be less disruptive change and later on every platform can decide utilise it with its own package naming

[codeclimate]

Code Climate has analyzed commit 0a297b8 and detected 0 issues on this pull request.

The test coverage on the diff in this pull request is 100.0% (50% is the threshold).

This pull request will bring the total coverage in the repository to 52.5% (0.1% change).

View more on Code Climate.

[rumch-se]

Hello @teacup-on-rockingchair
I changed the name again and implemented the proposed changes.
All the best
Rumen