-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 765
CMP-4034: Implemented a fix to make the compliance operator compatible with RHC… #14272
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
ATEX Test ResultsTest artifacts have been submitted to Testing Farm. Results: View Test Results This comment was automatically generated by the ATEX workflow. |
|
@yuumasato @Vincent056 Could you please help to review? Thanks. |
cf6a6b3 to
f5e0668
Compare
yuumasato
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks great @xiaojiey!
Thanks a lot
|
Pre-merge verification passed on 4.21 cluster with rhcos10 nodes. Verified also on 4.14 and 4.21 clusters, which were not affected by the change. |
…OS10
Description:
Previous, only rhel9 os supported for rhcos4 profiles. In this PR, add support for rhel10.
Rationale:
with the PR, the scan with rhcos profiles won't return "Not-Applicable".