feat: 0.5.0 release #1102
feat: 0.5.0 release #1102
Conversation
himanshu-dixit
requested review from
plxity and
utkarsh-dixit
as code owners
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
![ellipsis-dev[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/64358?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 Looks good to me! Reviewed everything up to d61ebfc in 1 minute and 22 seconds
More details
- Looked at
1514lines of code in37files - Skipped
1files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
6drafted comments based on config settings.
1. js/TO_DOs.md:2
- Draft comment:
Tasks marked as [DONE] should be checked off to avoid confusion. Consider using the format- [x]for completed tasks. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:50%
The TO_DOs.md file has tasks marked as [DONE] but they are not checked. This can be misleading.
2. js/src/constants.js:11
- Draft comment:
Ensure that the version in constants.js matches the version in package.json and package.dist.json for consistency. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:50%
The version in constants.js and constants.ts should match the version in package.json and package.dist.json for consistency.
3. js/src/constants.ts:11
- Draft comment:
Ensure that the version in constants.ts matches the version in package.json and package.dist.json for consistency. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:50%
The version in constants.js and constants.ts should match the version in package.json and package.dist.json for consistency.
4. js/src/frameworks/cloudflare.ts:39
- Draft comment:
Consider setting a default value forruntimein the constructor to be consistent with other frameworks. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:50%
The constructor in CloudflareToolSet is using a default value for runtime as null, which might not be intended. It should be consistent with other frameworks.
5. js/src/frameworks/langchain.ts:37
- Draft comment:
Consider setting a default value forruntimein the constructor to be consistent with other frameworks. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:50%
The constructor in LangchainToolSet is using a default value for runtime as null, which might not be intended. It should be consistent with other frameworks.
6. js/src/frameworks/openai.ts:38
- Draft comment:
Ensure that theruntimevalue is consistent across all framework constructors. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:50%
The constructor in OpenAIToolSet is using a default value for runtime as the framework name, which is consistent with other frameworks.
Workflow ID: wflow_GNgFESp66uKfM5ld
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
|
This comment was generated by github-actions[bot]! JS SDK Coverage Report📊 Coverage report for JS SDK can be found at the following URL: 📁 Test report folder can be found at the following URL: |
Code Review SummaryOverall AssessmentThe changes in this PR represent significant improvements to the codebase, particularly in terms of:
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
Recommendations
Overall, this is a solid improvement to the codebase that enhances maintainability and usability while maintaining backward compatibility. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 2f9201f in 37 seconds
More details
- Looked at
28lines of code in2files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
1drafted comments based on config settings.
1. js/src/sdk/models/backendClient.spec.ts:22
- Draft comment:
The error message in the test should match the one in the implementation. Update the error message to match the one inbackendClient.ts. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable:
While it's generally good practice for test error messages to match implementation, I can't verify if there's actually a mismatch since I don't have access to backendClient.ts. The comment requires knowledge of another file to validate its correctness. Following the rule about needing strong evidence, I should err on the side of removing the comment.
The comment could be correct - having mismatched error messages between tests and implementation is a real issue. I might be throwing away a valid comment.
Without seeing backendClient.ts, I cannot verify the comment's accuracy. The rules clearly state that if understanding requires more context from other files, we should delete the comment.
Delete the comment because we cannot verify its accuracy without seeing backendClient.ts, and the rules explicitly state to delete comments that require cross-file context.
Workflow ID: wflow_vGcaZyYCGWZJShe5
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 8501d12 in 53 seconds
More details
- Looked at
19lines of code in1files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
1drafted comments based on config settings.
1. js/src/sdk/base.toolset.ts:74
- Draft comment:
The JSDoc comment should reflect thatentityIdis optional, as it is marked optional in the constructor's parameter destructuring. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable:
The comment is technically correct - there's a mismatch between the JSDoc and the parameter definition. However, since entityId has a default value of "default", it's not truly optional in practice - it will always have a value. The JSDoc is actually more accurate to the real behavior. The optionality in the parameter is just an implementation detail.
The comment is pointing out a real inconsistency in the code documentation. Good documentation practices would suggest being precise about parameter optionality.
While technically correct, the comment is suggesting a change that would make the documentation less helpful. The entityId will always have a value due to the default, so marking it as optional in the JSDoc would be misleading to users.
The comment should be deleted because it's suggesting a change that would make the documentation less accurate to the actual behavior of the code.
Workflow ID: wflow_Oy7d4iEZ5yDbQK43
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 0d6d6b7 in 28 seconds
More details
- Looked at
19lines of code in1files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
1drafted comments based on config settings.
1. js/TO_DOs.md:4
- Draft comment:
Duplicate entry for 'Add test for connected account execution'. Please remove one to avoid confusion. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment looked like it was already resolved.
Workflow ID: wflow_5Qw3Si97z6U4JNTM
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
|
|
||
| export const getUUID = () => { | ||
| return crypto.randomUUID(); | ||
| return uuidv4(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@himanshu-dixit Let's verify this once
PS: We previously used crypto and replaced uuid v4
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ran example test with rc release
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on a2a7465 in 31 seconds
More details
- Looked at
13lines of code in1files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
1drafted comments based on config settings.
1. js/src/sdk/models/actions.spec.ts:9
- Draft comment:
Typo in variable name. ChangeconnectedAccounstoconnectedAccounts. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was on unchanged code.
Workflow ID: wflow_gsZU1XbEcIF4UTkr
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
![entelligence-ai-pr-reviews[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/932812?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
| runtime?: string; | ||
| } = {} | ||
| ) { | ||
| super( | ||
| config.apiKey || null, | ||
| config.baseUrl || COMPOSIO_BASE_URL, | ||
| config?.runtime || LangchainToolSet.FRAMEWORK_NAME, | ||
| config.entityId || LangchainToolSet.DEFAULT_ENTITY_ID | ||
| ); | ||
| super({ | ||
| apiKey: config.apiKey || null, | ||
| baseUrl: config.baseUrl || COMPOSIO_BASE_URL, | ||
| runtime: config?.runtime || null, | ||
| entityId: config.entityId || LangchainToolSet.DEFAULT_ENTITY_ID, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Bug Fix: The recent change in the constructor call from using positional arguments to an object may lead to logical errors if the object keys do not align with the expected parameters in the superclass constructor. This could result in incorrect initialization and potential runtime errors.
Actionable Steps:
- Verify that the object keys in the
supercall match the expected parameter names in the superclass constructor. - Ensure all necessary parameters are included and correctly mapped.
- Consider adding unit tests to validate the constructor behavior and catch any potential issues early.
This change is critical as it affects the initialization logic, which is foundational to the class's functionality. 🛠️
🔧 Suggested Code Diff:
super({
apiKey: config.apiKey || null,
baseUrl: config.baseUrl || COMPOSIO_BASE_URL,
- runtime: config?.runtime || null,
+ runtime: config?.runtime || LangchainToolSet.FRAMEWORK_NAME,
entityId: config.entityId || LangchainToolSet.DEFAULT_ENTITY_ID
});📝 Committable Code Suggestion
‼️ Ensure you review the code suggestion before committing it to the branch. Make sure it replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| runtime?: string; | |
| } = {} | |
| ) { | |
| super( | |
| config.apiKey || null, | |
| config.baseUrl || COMPOSIO_BASE_URL, | |
| config?.runtime || LangchainToolSet.FRAMEWORK_NAME, | |
| config.entityId || LangchainToolSet.DEFAULT_ENTITY_ID | |
| ); | |
| super({ | |
| apiKey: config.apiKey || null, | |
| baseUrl: config.baseUrl || COMPOSIO_BASE_URL, | |
| runtime: config?.runtime || null, | |
| entityId: config.entityId || LangchainToolSet.DEFAULT_ENTITY_ID, | |
| super({ | |
| apiKey: config.apiKey || null, | |
| baseUrl: config.baseUrl || COMPOSIO_BASE_URL, | |
| runtime: config?.runtime || LangchainToolSet.FRAMEWORK_NAME, | |
| entityId: config.entityId || LangchainToolSet.DEFAULT_ENTITY_ID | |
| }); |
| const testConfig = getTestConfig(); | ||
|
|
||
| beforeAll(() => { | ||
| toolset = new ComposioToolSet( | ||
| testConfig.COMPOSIO_API_KEY, | ||
| testConfig.BACKEND_HERMES_URL | ||
| ); | ||
| toolset = new ComposioToolSet({ | ||
| apiKey: testConfig.COMPOSIO_API_KEY, | ||
| baseUrl: testConfig.BACKEND_HERMES_URL, | ||
| runtime: "composio-ai", | ||
| entityId: "default", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Bug Fix: The change from positional arguments to an object with named properties in the ComposioToolSet constructor is significant. Ensure that the ComposioToolSet class is updated to handle this new structure. This change is critical as it can lead to runtime errors if not properly implemented. Verify all instances where ComposioToolSet is instantiated to ensure they conform to the new object structure.
🔧 Suggested Code Diff:
- toolset = new ComposioToolSet(
- testConfig.COMPOSIO_API_KEY,
- testConfig.BACKEND_HERMES_URL
- );
+ toolset = new ComposioToolSet({
+ apiKey: testConfig.COMPOSIO_API_KEY,
+ baseUrl: testConfig.BACKEND_HERMES_URL,
+ runtime: "composio-ai",
+ entityId: "default"
+ });📝 Committable Code Suggestion
‼️ Ensure you review the code suggestion before committing it to the branch. Make sure it replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| const testConfig = getTestConfig(); | |
| beforeAll(() => { | |
| toolset = new ComposioToolSet( | |
| testConfig.COMPOSIO_API_KEY, | |
| testConfig.BACKEND_HERMES_URL | |
| ); | |
| toolset = new ComposioToolSet({ | |
| apiKey: testConfig.COMPOSIO_API_KEY, | |
| baseUrl: testConfig.BACKEND_HERMES_URL, | |
| runtime: "composio-ai", | |
| entityId: "default", | |
| const testConfig = getTestConfig(); | |
| beforeAll(() => { | |
| toolset = new ComposioToolSet({ | |
| apiKey: testConfig.COMPOSIO_API_KEY, | |
| baseUrl: testConfig.BACKEND_HERMES_URL, | |
| runtime: "composio-ai", | |
| entityId: "default" | |
| }); | |
| }); |
| baseUrl: baseUrl || undefined, | ||
| runtime: runtime as string, | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| this.runtime = runtime || null; | ||
| this.backendClient = this.client.backendClient; | ||
| this.connectedAccounts = this.client.connectedAccounts; | ||
| this.apps = this.client.apps; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Potential Issue: The reassignment of this.runtime and this.backendClient without proper context or explanation can lead to logical errors. It's crucial to ensure that these properties are not being used elsewhere in a way that would conflict with their new values.
Actionable Steps:
- Review Usage: Check where
this.runtimeandthis.backendClientare used throughout the codebase to ensure their reassignment does not introduce bugs. - Justify Changes: Provide a clear rationale for why these properties need to be reassigned. If the reassignment is necessary, document the changes to prevent future confusion.
- Testing: Implement tests to verify that the new assignments do not break existing functionality.
🔍 Recommendation: Consider whether the reassignment is necessary or if the logic can be refactored to avoid potential issues.
🔧 Suggested Code Diff:
- this.runtime = runtime;
+ this.runtime = runtime || null;
- this.entityId = _entityId;
+ // Ensure entityId is set correctly if needed
+ // this.entityId = _entityId;📝 Committable Code Suggestion
‼️ Ensure you review the code suggestion before committing it to the branch. Make sure it replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| baseUrl: baseUrl || undefined, | |
| runtime: runtime as string, | |
| }); | |
| this.runtime = runtime || null; | |
| this.backendClient = this.client.backendClient; | |
| this.connectedAccounts = this.client.connectedAccounts; | |
| this.apps = this.client.apps; | |
| this.runtime = runtime || null; | |
| this.backendClient = this.client.backendClient; | |
| this.connectedAccounts = this.client.connectedAccounts; | |
| // Ensure entityId is set correctly if needed | |
| // this.entityId = _entityId; | |
| // Additional context or comments explaining the reassignment | |
| // The reassignment of `this.runtime` to `null` ensures that it is explicitly set to a non-undefined value, which can help avoid runtime errors in environments where `undefined` might cause issues. | |
| // The `backendClient` and `connectedAccounts` are reassigned from `this.client` to ensure they are always in sync with the client state. This change assumes that `this.client` is always correctly initialized before these assignments. |
| if (!latestAccount) { | ||
| for (const connectedAccount of connectedAccounts.items!) { | ||
| if ( | ||
| app?.toLocaleLowerCase() === | ||
| finalApp?.toLocaleLowerCase() === | ||
| connectedAccount.appName.toLocaleLowerCase() | ||
| ) { | ||
| const creationDate = new Date(connectedAccount.createdAt!); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Bug Fix: The change addresses a critical logical error by ensuring the correct variable finalApp is used in the comparison. This prevents potential runtime errors and ensures the application behaves as expected.
Actionable Suggestions:
- Verify that
finalAppis correctly defined and initialized before this comparison. - Ensure that
finalAppaccurately represents the intended logic for the comparison.
This change is crucial for maintaining the integrity of the application's logic and preventing incorrect behavior.
🔧 Suggested Code Diff:
- app?.toLocaleLowerCase() ===
+ finalApp?.toLocaleLowerCase() ===📝 Committable Code Suggestion
‼️ Ensure you review the code suggestion before committing it to the branch. Make sure it replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| if (!latestAccount) { | |
| for (const connectedAccount of connectedAccounts.items!) { | |
| if ( | |
| app?.toLocaleLowerCase() === | |
| finalApp?.toLocaleLowerCase() === | |
| connectedAccount.appName.toLocaleLowerCase() | |
| ) { | |
| const creationDate = new Date(connectedAccount.createdAt!); | |
| if (!latestAccount) { | |
| for (const connectedAccount of connectedAccounts.items!) { | |
| if (finalApp?.toLocaleLowerCase() === connectedAccount.appName.toLocaleLowerCase()) { | |
| const creationDate = new Date(connectedAccount.createdAt!); | |
| // Additional logic can be added here if needed | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } |
| } | ||
| } | ||
| if (!latestAccount) { | ||
| return null; | ||
| throw CEG.getCustomError( | ||
| COMPOSIO_SDK_ERROR_CODES.SDK.NO_CONNECTED_ACCOUNT_FOUND, | ||
| { | ||
| message: `Could not find a connection with app='${finalApp}' and entity='${this.id}'`, | ||
| description: `Could not find a connection with app='${finalApp}' and entity='${this.id}'`, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Potential Issue: The change from returning null to throwing a custom error is significant and can introduce breaking changes if the calling code does not handle exceptions properly. This can lead to runtime exceptions, application crashes, or unexpected behavior if not addressed.
Actionable Steps:
- Review Calling Code: Ensure all parts of the codebase that call this function are updated to handle the new exception. This includes adding try-catch blocks where necessary.
- Update Documentation: Clearly document this change in behavior so that other developers are aware of the new exception handling requirement.
- Testing: Conduct thorough testing to ensure that the new error handling logic works as expected and does not introduce new bugs.
Considerations:
- If backward compatibility is a concern, consider providing a transitional period where both behaviors are supported, or clearly communicate this change in release notes.
🔧 Suggested Code Diff:
- return null;
+ throw CEG.getCustomError(
+ COMPOSIO_SDK_ERROR_CODES.SDK.NO_CONNECTED_ACCOUNT_FOUND,
+ {
+ message: `Could not find a connection with app='${finalApp}' and entity='${this.id}'`,
+ description: `Could not find a connection with app='${finalApp}' and entity='${this.id}'`,
+ }📝 Committable Code Suggestion
‼️ Ensure you review the code suggestion before committing it to the branch. Make sure it replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| } | |
| } | |
| if (!latestAccount) { | |
| return null; | |
| throw CEG.getCustomError( | |
| COMPOSIO_SDK_ERROR_CODES.SDK.NO_CONNECTED_ACCOUNT_FOUND, | |
| { | |
| message: `Could not find a connection with app='${finalApp}' and entity='${this.id}'`, | |
| description: `Could not find a connection with app='${finalApp}' and entity='${this.id}'`, | |
| if (!latestAccount) { | |
| throw CEG.getCustomError( | |
| COMPOSIO_SDK_ERROR_CODES.SDK.NO_CONNECTED_ACCOUNT_FOUND, | |
| { | |
| message: `Could not find a connection with app='${finalApp}' and entity='${this.id}'`, | |
| description: `Could not find a connection with app='${finalApp}' and entity='${this.id}'`, | |
| } | |
| ); | |
| } |
| export type ActionListParams = z.infer<typeof ZGetListActionsParams>; | ||
| export type HeaderSingleParameters = z.infer<typeof ZParameter>; | ||
| export type CustomAuth = z.infer<typeof ZCustomAuthParams>; | ||
| export type ExecuteActionParam = z.infer<typeof ZExecuteParams>; | ||
| export type GetActionItemParam = z.infer<typeof ZActionGetParams>; | ||
| export type ActionxExecuteParam = z.infer<typeof ZExecuteParams>; | ||
| export type ActionItemParam = z.infer<typeof ZActionGetParams>; | ||
| export type FindActionEnumsByUseCaseParam = z.infer< | ||
| typeof ZFindActionEnumsByUseCaseParams | ||
| >; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Bug Fix: The current code contains typographical errors in type definitions, which can lead to runtime errors due to TypeScript not recognizing the correct types. This is a high-impact issue as it can cause incorrect behavior in the application. The suggested resolution is to correct the type names to match the intended definitions. Ensure that 'ExecuteActionParam' and 'GetActionItemParam' are correctly defined as 'ActionxExecuteParam' and 'ActionItemParam' respectively.
🔧 Suggested Code Diff:
export type ActionListParams = z.infer<typeof ZGetListActionsParams>;
export type HeaderSingleParameters = z.infer<typeof ZParameter>;
export type CustomAuth = z.infer<typeof ZCustomAuthParams>;
-export type ExecuteActionParam = z.infer<typeof ZExecuteParams>;
-export type GetActionItemParam = z.infer<typeof ZActionGetParams>;
+export type ActionxExecuteParam = z.infer<typeof ZExecuteParams>;
+export type ActionItemParam = z.infer<typeof ZActionGetParams>;
export type FindActionEnumsByUseCaseParam = z.infer<
typeof ZFindActionEnumsByUseCaseParams📝 Committable Code Suggestion
‼️ Ensure you review the code suggestion before committing it to the branch. Make sure it replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| export type ActionListParams = z.infer<typeof ZGetListActionsParams>; | |
| export type HeaderSingleParameters = z.infer<typeof ZParameter>; | |
| export type CustomAuth = z.infer<typeof ZCustomAuthParams>; | |
| export type ExecuteActionParam = z.infer<typeof ZExecuteParams>; | |
| export type GetActionItemParam = z.infer<typeof ZActionGetParams>; | |
| export type ActionxExecuteParam = z.infer<typeof ZExecuteParams>; | |
| export type ActionItemParam = z.infer<typeof ZActionGetParams>; | |
| export type FindActionEnumsByUseCaseParam = z.infer< | |
| typeof ZFindActionEnumsByUseCaseParams | |
| >; | |
| export type ActionListParams = z.infer<typeof ZGetListActionsParams>; | |
| export type HeaderSingleParameters = z.infer<typeof ZParameter>; | |
| export type CustomAuth = z.infer<typeof ZCustomAuthParams>; | |
| export type ActionxExecuteParam = z.infer<typeof ZExecuteParams>; | |
| export type ActionItemParam = z.infer<typeof ZActionGetParams>; | |
| export type FindActionEnumsByUseCaseParam = z.infer<typeof ZFindActionEnumsByUseCaseParams>; |
| * The response includes the action's name, display name, description, input parameters, expected response, associated app information, and enabled status. | ||
| * | ||
| * @param {GetActionData} data The data for the request. | ||
| * @returns {Promise<GetActionResponse[0]>} A promise that resolves to the details of the action. | ||
| * @returns {Promise<ActionItemGetRes[0]>} A promise that resolves to the details of the action. | ||
| * @throws {ComposioError} If the request fails. | ||
| */ | ||
| async get(data: GetActionItemParam): Promise<ActionDetails> { | ||
| async get(data: ActionItemParam): Promise<ActionDetails> { | ||
| TELEMETRY_LOGGER.manualTelemetry(TELEMETRY_EVENTS.SDK_METHOD_INVOKED, { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Potential Issue: The change in the return type from Promise<GetActionResponse[0]> to Promise<ActionItemGetRes[0]> is significant and could impact the function's integration with other parts of the codebase. It is crucial to ensure that ActionItemGetRes[0] is compatible with the expected structure and that all dependent code is updated to handle this new type.
Actionable Steps:
- Review Compatibility: Thoroughly review the
ActionItemGetRes[0]type to ensure it aligns with the expected return structure. - Update Dependencies: Check all instances where this function is used and update them to handle the new return type appropriately.
- Testing: Conduct comprehensive testing to verify that the change does not introduce any runtime errors or unexpected behavior.
This change is critical and requires careful consideration to avoid potential logical errors in the application. 🛠️
| * @returns {Promise<ActionExecuteResponse>} A promise that resolves to the execution status and response data. | ||
| * @throws {ComposioError} If the request fails. | ||
| */ | ||
| async execute(data: ExecuteActionParam): Promise<ActionExecuteResponse> { | ||
| async execute(data: ActionxExecuteParam): Promise<ActionExecuteResponse> { | ||
| TELEMETRY_LOGGER.manualTelemetry(TELEMETRY_EVENTS.SDK_METHOD_INVOKED, { | ||
| method: "execute", | ||
| file: this.fileName, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Potential Issue: The change in the type definition from ExecuteActionParam to ActionxExecuteParam appears to be a typo. This could lead to runtime errors if ActionxExecuteParam is not defined or incorrect.
Actionable Steps:
- Verify Type Definition: Check if
ActionxExecuteParamis a valid and intended type. - Revert if Necessary: If
ExecuteActionParamis the correct type, revert the change. - Ensure Consistency: If
ActionxExecuteParamis correct, ensure it is defined and used consistently across the codebase.
This issue is critical as it can cause failures in function execution, impacting the application's reliability.
🔧 Suggested Code Diff:
- async execute(data: ActionxExecuteParam): Promise<ActionExecuteResponse> {
+ async execute(data: ExecuteActionParam): Promise<ActionExecuteResponse> {📝 Committable Code Suggestion
‼️ Ensure you review the code suggestion before committing it to the branch. Make sure it replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| * @returns {Promise<ActionExecuteResponse>} A promise that resolves to the execution status and response data. | |
| * @throws {ComposioError} If the request fails. | |
| */ | |
| async execute(data: ExecuteActionParam): Promise<ActionExecuteResponse> { | |
| async execute(data: ActionxExecuteParam): Promise<ActionExecuteResponse> { | |
| TELEMETRY_LOGGER.manualTelemetry(TELEMETRY_EVENTS.SDK_METHOD_INVOKED, { | |
| method: "execute", | |
| file: this.fileName, | |
| async execute(data: ExecuteActionParam): Promise<ActionExecuteResponse> { | |
| TELEMETRY_LOGGER.manualTelemetry(TELEMETRY_EVENTS.SDK_METHOD_INVOKED, { | |
| method: "execute", | |
| file: this.fileName, | |
| }); | |
| // Additional implementation here | |
| } |
| * Finds all action enums by use case. | ||
| * | ||
| * @param {FindActionEnumsByUseCaseParam} data The data for the request. | ||
| * @returns {Promise<Array<string>>} A promise that resolves to the list of action enums. | ||
| * @returns {Promise<ActionFindActionEnumsByUseCaseRes>} A promise that resolves to the list of action enums. | ||
| * @throws {ComposioError} If the request fails. | ||
| */ | ||
| async findActionEnumsByUseCase( | ||
| data: FindActionEnumsByUseCaseParam |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Potential Issue: The change in the return type of the findActionEnumsByUseCase function from Promise<Array<string>> to Promise<ActionFindActionEnumsByUseCaseRes> is significant and could lead to logical errors if not handled properly. This change requires a thorough review of the ActionFindActionEnumsByUseCaseRes type to ensure it aligns with the expected structure and usage throughout the codebase. Additionally, all instances where this function is used should be checked to confirm compatibility with the new return type.
Actionable Steps:
- Review the
ActionFindActionEnumsByUseCaseResType: Ensure it matches the expected structure and contains all necessary fields. - Verify Function Usages: Check all places where
findActionEnumsByUseCaseis called to ensure they handle the new return type correctly. - Update Documentation: If the new type introduces changes in how the function should be used, update the documentation accordingly.
This change is critical and should be prioritized to prevent potential runtime errors or incorrect behavior in the application.
| * @returns {Promise<ActionExecuteResponse>} A promise that resolves to the execution status and response data. | ||
| * @throws {ComposioError} If the request fails. | ||
| */ | ||
| async executeRequest(data: ExecuteReqDTO): Promise<ActionExecuteResponse> { | ||
| async executeRequest( | ||
| data: ActionExecuteReqParam | ||
| ): Promise<ActionExecuteResponse> { | ||
| TELEMETRY_LOGGER.manualTelemetry(TELEMETRY_EVENTS.SDK_METHOD_INVOKED, { | ||
| method: "executeRequest", | ||
| file: this.fileName, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Bug Fix: The identified issue is a typographical error in the type definition of the function parameter, which is critical as it can lead to runtime errors. The change from ExecuteReqDTO to ActionExecuteReqParam ensures that the function receives the correct type of argument, preventing potential crashes or unexpected behavior.
Actionable Steps:
- Verify Consistency: Ensure that the type
ActionExecuteReqParamis used consistently across the codebase. - Check Function Calls: Review all instances where
executeRequestis called to confirm they pass the correct type. - Testing: Conduct thorough testing to ensure that the change does not introduce new issues.
This change is crucial for maintaining the integrity and reliability of the function's execution.
🔧 Suggested Code Diff:
- async executeRequest(data: ExecuteReqDTO): Promise<ActionExecuteResponse> {
+ async executeRequest(data: ActionExecuteReqParam): Promise<ActionExecuteResponse> {📝 Committable Code Suggestion
‼️ Ensure you review the code suggestion before committing it to the branch. Make sure it replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| * @returns {Promise<ActionExecuteResponse>} A promise that resolves to the execution status and response data. | |
| * @throws {ComposioError} If the request fails. | |
| */ | |
| async executeRequest(data: ExecuteReqDTO): Promise<ActionExecuteResponse> { | |
| async executeRequest( | |
| data: ActionExecuteReqParam | |
| ): Promise<ActionExecuteResponse> { | |
| TELEMETRY_LOGGER.manualTelemetry(TELEMETRY_EVENTS.SDK_METHOD_INVOKED, { | |
| method: "executeRequest", | |
| file: this.fileName, | |
| async executeRequest(data: ActionExecuteReqParam): Promise<ActionExecuteResponse> { | |
| TELEMETRY_LOGGER.manualTelemetry(TELEMETRY_EVENTS.SDK_METHOD_INVOKED, { | |
| method: "executeRequest", | |
| file: this.fileName, | |
| }); | |
| // Additional implementation code here | |
| } |
|
|
||
| export type TriggerItemParam = z.infer<typeof ZTriggerItemParam>; | ||
| export type GetActiveTriggersData = z.infer<typeof ZActiveTriggersQuery>; | ||
| export type TriggerItem = z.infer<typeof ZActiveTriggerItemRes>; | ||
| export type TriggerItemRes = z.infer<typeof ZActiveTriggerItemRes>; | ||
| export type TriggerChangeResponse = { status: string }; | ||
| export class ActiveTriggers { | ||
| // Remove this as we might not need it |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Bug Fix: The change addresses a typographical error in the type definition, correcting TriggerItem to TriggerItemRes. This correction is crucial as it ensures type consistency across the codebase, preventing potential runtime errors and unexpected behavior. Ensuring accurate type definitions is essential for maintaining the reliability and stability of the application.
🔧 Suggested Code Diff:
-export type TriggerItem = z.infer<typeof ZActiveTriggerItemRes>;
+export type TriggerItemRes = z.infer<typeof ZActiveTriggerItemRes>;📝 Committable Code Suggestion
‼️ Ensure you review the code suggestion before committing it to the branch. Make sure it replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| export type TriggerItemParam = z.infer<typeof ZTriggerItemParam>; | |
| export type GetActiveTriggersData = z.infer<typeof ZActiveTriggersQuery>; | |
| export type TriggerItem = z.infer<typeof ZActiveTriggerItemRes>; | |
| export type TriggerItemRes = z.infer<typeof ZActiveTriggerItemRes>; | |
| export type TriggerChangeResponse = { status: string }; | |
| export class ActiveTriggers { | |
| // Remove this as we might not need it | |
| export type TriggerItemParam = z.infer<typeof ZTriggerItemParam>; | |
| export type GetActiveTriggersData = z.infer<typeof ZActiveTriggersQuery>; | |
| export type TriggerItemRes = z.infer<typeof ZActiveTriggerItemRes>; | |
| export type TriggerChangeResponse = { status: string }; |
| * The response includes the trigger's name, description, input parameters, expected response, associated app information, and enabled status. | ||
| * | ||
| * @param {TriggerItemParam} data The data for the request. | ||
| * @returns {Promise<TriggerItem>} A promise that resolves to the details of the active trigger. | ||
| * @returns {Promise<TriggerItemRes>} A promise that resolves to the details of the active trigger. | ||
| * @throws {ComposioError} If the request fails. | ||
| */ | ||
| async get({ triggerId }: TriggerItemParam) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Bug Fix: The change in the return type from Promise<TriggerItem> to Promise<TriggerItemRes> in the function's documentation is significant. This alteration suggests a change in the expected output of the function, which could lead to runtime errors if the rest of the codebase is not updated to handle the new return type.
Actionable Steps:
- Review Usage: Examine all instances where the
getfunction is called to ensure they are compatible with the new return typePromise<TriggerItemRes>. - Update Code: Modify any dependent code that expects the old return type to handle
TriggerItemResappropriately. - Documentation: Ensure that all related documentation reflects this change to prevent confusion for future developers.
This change is critical and should be addressed promptly to avoid potential issues in the application. 🛠️
| }, | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| return data?.triggers?.[0] as unknown as TriggerItem; | ||
| return data?.triggers?.[0] as unknown as TriggerItemRes; | ||
| } catch (error) { | ||
| throw CEG.handleAllError(error); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Bug Fix: The change from TriggerItem to TriggerItemRes in the type casting may lead to logical errors if TriggerItemRes is not compatible with the data structure of data?.triggers?.[0]. This could result in runtime errors and application failures.
Actionable Steps:
- Verify Compatibility: Ensure that
TriggerItemResis indeed the correct type for the data being returned. This involves checking the structure and properties ofdata?.triggers?.[0]againstTriggerItemRes. - Update Dependent Code: If
TriggerItemResis the correct type, ensure all parts of the codebase that use this return value are updated to handleTriggerItemResappropriately. - Testing: Conduct thorough testing to ensure that the change does not introduce any new issues or break existing functionality.
This change is critical and should be handled with caution to prevent potential application failures. 🛠️
🔧 Suggested Code Diff:
- return data?.triggers?.[0] as unknown as TriggerItem;
+ return data?.triggers?.[0] as unknown as TriggerItemRes;📝 Committable Code Suggestion
‼️ Ensure you review the code suggestion before committing it to the branch. Make sure it replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| }, | |
| }); | |
| return data?.triggers?.[0] as unknown as TriggerItem; | |
| return data?.triggers?.[0] as unknown as TriggerItemRes; | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| throw CEG.handleAllError(error); | |
| } | |
| try { | |
| // Assuming data is fetched and processed correctly before this point | |
| const trigger = data?.triggers?.[0]; | |
| if (!trigger) { | |
| throw new Error('No trigger found'); | |
| } | |
| // Ensure the trigger is compatible with TriggerItemRes | |
| return trigger as unknown as TriggerItemRes; | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| throw CEG.handleAllError(error); | |
| } |
| * @returns {Promise<ZActiveTriggerItemRes[]>} A promise that resolves to the list of all active triggers. | ||
| * @throws {ComposioError} If the request fails. | ||
| */ | ||
| async list(data: GetActiveTriggersData = {}): Promise<TriggerItem[]> { | ||
| async list(data: GetActiveTriggersData = {}): Promise<TriggerItemRes[]> { | ||
| TELEMETRY_LOGGER.manualTelemetry(TELEMETRY_EVENTS.SDK_METHOD_INVOKED, { | ||
| method: "list", | ||
| file: this.fileName, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Bug Fix: The change in the return type from TriggerItem[] to TriggerItemRes[] is a significant modification that can lead to runtime errors if not handled properly. This change requires a thorough review of all instances where the list function is invoked to ensure compatibility with the new return type.
Actionable Steps:
- Audit Usage: Review all code sections where the
listfunction is called. Ensure that the handling of the return type is updated to accommodateTriggerItemRes[]. - Update Dependent Code: Modify any dependent logic that processes the return type to prevent potential errors.
- Testing: Implement comprehensive testing to verify that the changes do not introduce new bugs or regressions.
This change is critical and should be prioritized to maintain code stability. 🛠️
| query: parsedData, | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| return response?.triggers as unknown as TriggerItem[]; | ||
| return response?.triggers as unknown as TriggerItemRes[]; | ||
| } catch (error) { | ||
| throw CEG.handleAllError(error); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Potential Issue: The change from TriggerItem[] to TriggerItemRes[] could introduce logical errors if TriggerItemRes is not compatible with the expected type in other parts of the code. This change should be thoroughly reviewed to ensure that TriggerItemRes[] is indeed the correct type. Additionally, verify that all parts of the codebase interacting with this type are updated to prevent runtime errors.
Actionable Steps:
- Confirm that
TriggerItemRes[]is the intended type forresponse?.triggers. - Review the codebase for any dependencies on
TriggerItem[]and update them toTriggerItemRes[]if necessary. - Run comprehensive tests to ensure no runtime errors occur due to this change.
| * | ||
| * This method allows clients to fetch detailed information about a specific app by providing its unique key. The response includes the app's name, key, status, description, logo, categories, authentication schemes, and other metadata. | ||
| * | ||
| * @param {GetAppDataParams} data The data for the request, including the app's unique key. | ||
| * @param {AppGetDataParams} data The data for the request, including the app's unique key. | ||
| * @returns {Promise<AppItemResponse>} A promise that resolves to the details of the app. | ||
| * @throws {ComposioError} If the request fails. | ||
| */ | ||
| async get(data: GetAppDataParams): Promise<AppItemResponse> { | ||
| async get(data: AppGetDataParams): Promise<AppItemResponse> { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Bug Fix: The change corrects a typographical error in the type definition from GetAppDataParams to AppGetDataParams. This is crucial as using the correct type definition ensures that the function behaves as expected and prevents runtime errors due to type mismatches.
Actionable Steps:
- Verify that
AppGetDataParamsis correctly defined in the codebase. - Ensure consistent usage of
AppGetDataParamsacross all relevant parts of the code to avoid any type-related issues. - Conduct a thorough test to confirm that the change does not introduce any new issues.
This change is highly impactful as it addresses a potential source of runtime errors. 🛠️
🔧 Suggested Code Diff:
- async get(data: GetAppDataParams): Promise<AppItemResponse> {
+ async get(data: AppGetDataParams): Promise<AppItemResponse> {📝 Committable Code Suggestion
‼️ Ensure you review the code suggestion before committing it to the branch. Make sure it replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| * | |
| * This method allows clients to fetch detailed information about a specific app by providing its unique key. The response includes the app's name, key, status, description, logo, categories, authentication schemes, and other metadata. | |
| * | |
| * @param {GetAppDataParams} data The data for the request, including the app's unique key. | |
| * @param {AppGetDataParams} data The data for the request, including the app's unique key. | |
| * @returns {Promise<AppItemResponse>} A promise that resolves to the details of the app. | |
| * @throws {ComposioError} If the request fails. | |
| */ | |
| async get(data: GetAppDataParams): Promise<AppItemResponse> { | |
| async get(data: AppGetDataParams): Promise<AppItemResponse> { | |
| /** | |
| * This method allows clients to fetch detailed information about a specific app by providing its unique key. | |
| * The response includes the app's name, key, status, description, logo, categories, authentication schemes, and other metadata. | |
| * @param {AppGetDataParams} data The data for the request, including the app's unique key. | |
| * @returns {Promise<AppItemResponse>} A promise that resolves to the details of the app. | |
| * @throws {ComposioError} If the request fails. | |
| */ | |
| async get(data: AppGetDataParams): Promise<AppItemResponse> { | |
| // Implementation of the function | |
| } |
| * This method allows clients to fetch the necessary parameters for a specific app by providing its unique key. The response includes the app's name, key, status, description, logo, categories, authentication schemes, and other metadata. | ||
| * | ||
| * @param {string} appId The unique key of the app. | ||
| * @returns {Promise<RequiredParamsFullResponse>} A promise that resolves to the required parameters for the app. | ||
| * @returns {Promise<AppRequiredParamsFullResponse>} A promise that resolves to the required parameters for the app. | ||
| * @throws {ComposioError} If the request fails. | ||
| */ | ||
| async getRequiredParams(appId: string): Promise<RequiredParamsFullResponse> { | ||
| async getRequiredParams( | ||
| appId: string |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Potential Issue: The change in the return type from RequiredParamsFullResponse to AppRequiredParamsFullResponse is significant and could lead to logical errors if not handled properly. This change requires a thorough review of the AppRequiredParamsFullResponse type to ensure it aligns with the expected structure and functionality. Additionally, all parts of the codebase that interact with this function should be updated to accommodate the new return type. This includes checking for any type mismatches, ensuring that all dependent functions or modules are compatible, and updating any documentation that references the old type.
| authSchemes as Array<{ mode: string }> | ||
| )?.map((scheme) => scheme?.mode); | ||
|
|
||
| const authSchemesObject: Record<string, RequiredParamsResponse> = {}; | ||
| const authSchemesObject: Record<string, AppRequiredParamsResponse> = {}; | ||
|
|
||
| for (const scheme of authSchemes as Array<{ | ||
| mode: string; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Potential Issue: The change in type definition for authSchemesObject from Record<string, RequiredParamsResponse> to Record<string, AppRequiredParamsResponse> could introduce logical errors if AppRequiredParamsResponse is not compatible with RequiredParamsResponse. This change needs careful review to ensure compatibility and prevent runtime errors.
Actionable Steps:
- Review Type Definitions: Verify that
AppRequiredParamsResponseis compatible withRequiredParamsResponse. - Check Usage Consistency: Ensure all usages of
authSchemesObjectalign with the new type definition. - Update Dependent Code: Modify any dependent code to accommodate the new type if necessary.
This change is critical and should be thoroughly tested to avoid potential issues. 🛠️
| * | ||
| * This method allows clients to explore and discover the supported integrations. It returns an array of integration objects, each containing essential details such as the integration's key, name, description, logo, categories, and unique identifier. | ||
| * | ||
| * @returns {Promise<IntegrationListResponse>} A promise that resolves to the list of all integrations. | ||
| * @returns {Promise<IntegrationListRes>} A promise that resolves to the list of all integrations. | ||
| * @throws {ComposioError} If the request fails. | ||
| */ | ||
| async list( | ||
| data: ListAllIntegrationsData = {} | ||
| ): Promise<IntegrationListResponse> { | ||
| async list(data: IntegrationListParam = {}): Promise<IntegrationListRes> { | ||
| TELEMETRY_LOGGER.manualTelemetry(TELEMETRY_EVENTS.SDK_METHOD_INVOKED, { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Potential Issue: The recent changes involve renaming types and parameters, which can lead to runtime errors if not handled correctly. It's crucial to ensure that the new types IntegrationListRes and IntegrationListParam are properly defined and consistently used throughout the codebase. Additionally, all references to the old types should be updated to prevent any mismatches in expected data structures.
Actionable Steps:
- Verify the definitions of
IntegrationListResandIntegrationListParamin the codebase. - Ensure all instances of the old types are updated to the new ones.
- Run comprehensive tests to confirm that the changes do not break existing functionality.
This will help maintain the integrity of the code and prevent potential bugs. 🛠️
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on fcccad8 in 20 seconds
More details
- Looked at
41lines of code in3files - Skipped
3files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
1drafted comments based on config settings.
1. js/examples/lead_outreach_agent/package.json:14
- Draft comment:
Consider using a stable version ofcomposio-corefor production environments instead of a release candidate version like0.5.0-rc.6. This applies to other examples as well. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:50%
The package.json files in the examples have been updated to use a specific release candidate version of composio-core. This is a good practice for testing specific versions, but it should be noted that using a release candidate in production might not be ideal due to potential instability.
Workflow ID: wflow_CuoO79jg7Bn5icN7
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
| baseUrl: baseUrl || undefined, | ||
| runtime: runtime as string, | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| this.runtime = runtime || null; | ||
| this.backendClient = this.client.backendClient; | ||
| this.connectedAccounts = this.client.connectedAccounts; | ||
| this.apps = this.client.apps; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Bug Fix: The current changes introduce potential logical errors:
-
Runtime Assignment: Changing
this.runtimetoruntime || nullcan inadvertently assignnulltothis.runtimewhenruntimeis a valid falsy value (e.g.,0,''). This could lead to unexpected behavior if such values are intended to be preserved. -
EntityId Removal: The removal of
this.entityId = _entityId;is critical as it might break functionality that depends onentityIdbeing set. This could lead to runtime errors ifentityIdis accessed elsewhere in the code.
Actionable Suggestions:
- Runtime Assignment: Ensure that only
undefinedornullvalues are replaced withnull. Consider using a more explicit check. - EntityId: Verify if
entityIdis required. If so, reintroduce the assignment to prevent potential errors.
Suggested Code Changes:
- this.runtime = runtime || null;
+ this.runtime = runtime !== undefined ? runtime : null;
+ this.entityId = _entityId; // Reintroduce if necessary🔧 Suggested Code Diff:
- this.runtime = runtime || null;
+ this.runtime = runtime !== undefined ? runtime : null;
+ this.entityId = _entityId; // Reintroduce if necessary📝 Committable Code Suggestion
‼️ Ensure you review the code suggestion before committing it to the branch. Make sure it replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| baseUrl: baseUrl || undefined, | |
| runtime: runtime as string, | |
| }); | |
| this.runtime = runtime || null; | |
| this.backendClient = this.client.backendClient; | |
| this.connectedAccounts = this.client.connectedAccounts; | |
| this.apps = this.client.apps; | |
| this.runtime = runtime !== undefined ? runtime : null; | |
| this.backendClient = this.client.backendClient; | |
| this.connectedAccounts = this.client.connectedAccounts; | |
| this.entityId = _entityId; // Reintroduce if necessary |
| .then((actions) => actions.length > 0); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| async getEntity(entityId: string) { | ||
| return this.client.getEntity(entityId); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| async executeAction( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Bug Fix: The removal of the default value for entityId in the destructuring assignment can lead to undefined behavior if entityId is not provided in functionParams. This change is critical as it may break existing functionality that relies on the default value. To ensure backward compatibility and prevent potential errors, it is recommended to reintroduce the default value for entityId. This will maintain the expected behavior of the function when entityId is not explicitly provided.
🔧 Suggested Code Diff:
+ entityId = "default",📝 Committable Code Suggestion
‼️ Ensure you review the code suggestion before committing it to the branch. Make sure it replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| .then((actions) => actions.length > 0); | |
| } | |
| async getEntity(entityId: string) { | |
| return this.client.getEntity(entityId); | |
| } | |
| async executeAction( | |
| async getEntity(entityId: string = "default") { | |
| return this.client.getEntity(entityId); | |
| } |
| if (!latestAccount) { | ||
| for (const connectedAccount of connectedAccounts.items!) { | ||
| if ( | ||
| app?.toLocaleLowerCase() === | ||
| finalApp?.toLocaleLowerCase() === | ||
| connectedAccount.appName.toLocaleLowerCase() | ||
| ) { | ||
| const creationDate = new Date(connectedAccount.createdAt!); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Bug Fix: The change from app to finalApp in the conditional check may introduce a logical error if finalApp is not correctly initialized or intended to replace app. This could lead to incorrect logic flow and potential bugs.
Actionable Steps:
- Verify Initialization: Ensure that
finalAppis properly initialized before this check. - Confirm Intent: Check if
finalAppis indeed the intended variable to use in this context. Ifappwas the intended variable, revert the change. - Testing: After making the necessary changes, conduct thorough testing to ensure the logic behaves as expected.
🔍 Recommendation: Double-check the initialization and usage of finalApp to prevent any unintended behavior.
🔧 Suggested Code Diff:
- app?.toLocaleLowerCase() ===
+ finalApp?.toLocaleLowerCase() ===📝 Committable Code Suggestion
‼️ Ensure you review the code suggestion before committing it to the branch. Make sure it replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| if (!latestAccount) { | |
| for (const connectedAccount of connectedAccounts.items!) { | |
| if ( | |
| app?.toLocaleLowerCase() === | |
| finalApp?.toLocaleLowerCase() === | |
| connectedAccount.appName.toLocaleLowerCase() | |
| ) { | |
| const creationDate = new Date(connectedAccount.createdAt!); | |
| if (!latestAccount) { | |
| for (const connectedAccount of connectedAccounts.items!) { | |
| if (finalApp && finalApp.toLocaleLowerCase() === connectedAccount.appName.toLocaleLowerCase()) { | |
| const creationDate = new Date(connectedAccount.createdAt!); | |
| // Additional logic here | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } |
| } | ||
| } | ||
| if (!latestAccount) { | ||
| return null; | ||
| throw CEG.getCustomError( | ||
| COMPOSIO_SDK_ERROR_CODES.SDK.NO_CONNECTED_ACCOUNT_FOUND, | ||
| { | ||
| message: `Could not find a connection with app='${finalApp}' and entity='${this.id}'`, | ||
| description: `Could not find a connection with app='${finalApp}' and entity='${this.id}'`, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Bug Fix: The change from returning null to throwing a custom error is significant and can impact the control flow of the application. This modification requires a thorough review of all code paths that interact with this function to ensure they can handle the new error-throwing behavior.
Actionable Steps:
- Audit Usage: Review all instances where this function is called to ensure they are equipped to handle the custom error.
- Update Error Handling: Modify any dependent code to catch and manage the custom error appropriately, ensuring that the application logic remains consistent.
- Testing: Implement comprehensive tests to verify that the new error handling does not introduce regressions or unexpected behavior.
This change is critical as it alters the expected output and can potentially break existing functionality if not handled correctly. 🛠️
| * @returns {Promise<ActionExecuteResponse>} A promise that resolves to the execution status and response data. | ||
| * @throws {ComposioError} If the request fails. | ||
| */ | ||
| async execute(data: ExecuteActionParam): Promise<ActionExecuteResponse> { | ||
| async execute(data: ActionxExecuteParam): Promise<ActionExecuteResponse> { | ||
| TELEMETRY_LOGGER.manualTelemetry(TELEMETRY_EVENTS.SDK_METHOD_INVOKED, { | ||
| method: "execute", | ||
| file: this.fileName, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Bug Fix: The change in parameter type from ExecuteActionParam to ActionxExecuteParam is likely a mistake. This could lead to runtime errors if the new type does not align with the expected input for the execute method. It is crucial to verify the correct parameter type to ensure the method functions as intended.
Actionable Steps:
- Confirm the intended parameter type for the
executemethod. - If
ActionxExecuteParamis incorrect, revert toExecuteActionParam. - Ensure the type definition aligns with the method's logic and expected input.
🔧 Suggested Code Diff:
- async execute(data: ActionxExecuteParam): Promise<ActionExecuteResponse> {
+ async execute(data: ExecuteActionParam): Promise<ActionExecuteResponse> {📝 Committable Code Suggestion
‼️ Ensure you review the code suggestion before committing it to the branch. Make sure it replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| * @returns {Promise<ActionExecuteResponse>} A promise that resolves to the execution status and response data. | |
| * @throws {ComposioError} If the request fails. | |
| */ | |
| async execute(data: ExecuteActionParam): Promise<ActionExecuteResponse> { | |
| async execute(data: ActionxExecuteParam): Promise<ActionExecuteResponse> { | |
| TELEMETRY_LOGGER.manualTelemetry(TELEMETRY_EVENTS.SDK_METHOD_INVOKED, { | |
| method: "execute", | |
| file: this.fileName, | |
| async execute(data: ExecuteActionParam): Promise<ActionExecuteResponse> { | |
| TELEMETRY_LOGGER.manualTelemetry(TELEMETRY_EVENTS.SDK_METHOD_INVOKED, { | |
| method: "execute", | |
| file: this.fileName, | |
| }); | |
| // Additional logic for the execute method should be here | |
| } |
New Features
ComposioToolsetinindex.ts.getTriggerInfototrigger..apps,.actions,.triggers, and.connectedAccountin toolset classes.ComposioErrorfor improved consistency.error.error_codefor better debugging.PreProcessor,PostProcessor, andSchemaProcessor.Breaking Changes
Important
Release 0.5.0 introduces new features, performance improvements, and breaking changes to the Composio SDK, including enhanced error handling, type safety, and framework support.
ComposioToolsetinindex.ts.getTriggerInfomethod totrigger..apps,.actions,.triggers, and.connectedAccountin toolset classes.ComposioError.error.error_codefor debugging.PreProcessor,PostProcessor, andSchemaProcessor.Makefilefor build automation.switch_package.shfor package management.winstonlogger in favor of a custom logger.bump_version.shandconstants.js.index.ts.This description was created by
for fcccad8. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.