Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Added remove integration support, added 10mb buffer size while testing JS example #982

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 11, 2024

Conversation

plxity
Copy link
Contributor

@plxity plxity commented Dec 11, 2024

  1. Added 10mb buffer size while running JS examples
  2. Added --remove support in integration CLI command

Important

Add --remove <id> option to integrations CLI and increase buffer size for JS tests.

  • CLI Enhancements:
    • Added --remove <id> option to integrations command in integrations.ts to remove integrations by ID.
  • Testing:
    • Increased maxBuffer size to 10MB in test_examples.test.js for JS example tests to handle larger outputs.

This description was created by Ellipsis for 3b3fec1. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Dec 11, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
composio ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Dec 11, 2024 9:40am

Copy link
Contributor

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 Looks good to me! Reviewed everything up to 46072fb in 9 seconds

More details
  • Looked at 81 lines of code in 3 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 2 drafted comments based on config settings.
1. js/src/cli/apps.ts:38
  • Draft comment:
    The use of optional chaining with options?.enabled is unnecessary since options is always defined in this context. Consider using options.enabled instead.
const onlyShowEnabledApps = options.enabled;
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence changes required: 50%
    The use of optional chaining with options?.enabled is unnecessary since options is always defined in this context.
2. js/src/cli/integrations.ts:23
  • Draft comment:
    The remove option in the handleAction method should be optional, as it might not always be provided by the user. Consider updating the type definition to reflect this.
private async handleAction(options: { active: boolean, remove?: string }): Promise<void> {
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence changes required: 50%
    The remove option in the handleAction method should be optional, as it might not always be provided by the user.

Workflow ID: wflow_eHCCJ8e7lbygby3r


You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

Copy link
Contributor

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 3b3fec1 in 8 seconds

More details
  • Looked at 84 lines of code in 2 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 1 drafted comments based on config settings.
1. js/src/cli/integrations.ts:35
  • Draft comment:
    Consider using a logging library instead of console.log for error handling to improve maintainability and monitoring. This applies to other instances of console.log in this file as well.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence changes required: 50%
    The code in integrations.ts uses console.log for error handling, which is not ideal for production code. It would be better to use a logging library or handle errors in a way that can be easily managed and monitored.

Workflow ID: wflow_gHeyOJepEooBEBms


You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

@@ -31,6 +31,25 @@ export default class ConnectionsCommand {
console.log(chalk.red((error as any).message));
return;
}
const removeIntegrationId = options.remove || '';

if(removeIntegrationId){
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Consider adding a confirmation prompt before deletion to prevent accidental removals. This is a destructive operation and should have an additional safety check.

@@ -31,6 +31,25 @@ export default class ConnectionsCommand {
console.log(chalk.red((error as any).message));
return;
}
const removeIntegrationId = options.remove || '';
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The empty string fallback for removeIntegrationId could lead to unexpected behavior. Consider throwing an error if the ID is empty or invalid format instead.

const { stdout, stderr } = await execFileAsync(
"node",
[example.file],
options
{ ...options, maxBuffer: 10 * 1024 * 1024 }
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Consider defining the maxBuffer size as a named constant with a comment explaining why 10MB is needed. This helps with maintenance and makes the purpose clear.

@shreysingla11
Copy link
Collaborator

Code Review Summary

Overall, the changes are well-structured and add useful functionality, but there are a few areas that could use improvement:

Strengths:

  • Good integration with existing SDK functionality
  • Proper error handling in most cases
  • Consistent with existing codebase patterns

Suggestions for Improvement:

  1. Add a confirmation prompt for integration deletion
  2. Better validation for integration IDs
  3. Document the maxBuffer size configuration
  4. Consider adding logging for audit purposes on integration deletion

The code is generally good quality but could benefit from these safety and maintainability improvements. Once these are addressed, the changes will be more robust and maintainable.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 11, 2024

This comment was generated by github-actions[bot]!

JS SDK Coverage Report

📊 Coverage report for JS SDK can be found at the following URL:
https://pub-92e668239ab84bfd80ee07d61e9d2f40.r2.dev/coverage-12273617708/coverage/index.html

📁 Test report folder can be found at the following URL:
https://pub-92e668239ab84bfd80ee07d61e9d2f40.r2.dev/html-report-12273617708/html-report/report.html

@plxity plxity enabled auto-merge (squash) December 11, 2024 09:46
@plxity plxity merged commit 0a4fa37 into master Dec 11, 2024
13 checks passed
@plxity plxity deleted the fix-cli-parity-3 branch December 11, 2024 09:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants