Include components field #48
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes introduce a new variable Changes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
pkg/connector/tickets.go (2)
29-35: LGTM! Consider adding a comment for clarity.The introduction of the
ignoreRequiredSystemmap is a good addition for filtering out specific required system fields. This will help in streamlining the ticket creation process.Consider adding a brief comment above the variable declaration to explain its purpose and usage. For example:
// ignoreRequiredSystem is a map of system fields that should be ignored // when processing required fields during ticket creation. var ignoreRequiredSystem = map[string]bool{ // ... (existing fields) }
241-248: Approved. Consider refactoring for improved readability.The changes to the
getCustomFieldsForIssueTypefunction provide more nuanced handling of required fields, which is a good improvement. The explicit check for thecomponentsfield and the use ofignoreRequiredSystemmap enhance the flexibility of the function.To improve readability and maintainability, consider refactoring the condition into separate functions. Here's a suggestion:
func (d *Connector) shouldProcessField(field *jira.Field) bool { if field.Required { return !ignoreRequiredSystem[field.FieldId] } return field.Schema.Custom != "" || field.FieldId == "components" } // In getCustomFieldsForIssueType: for _, field := range issueFields { if !d.shouldProcessField(field) { continue } // Rest of the processing logic }This refactoring encapsulates the logic for determining whether a field should be processed, making the main function easier to read and maintain.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- pkg/connector/tickets.go (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (1)
pkg/connector/tickets.go (1)
Line range hint
1-724: Overall, the changes look good and improve field handling.The introduction of the
ignoreRequiredSystemmap and the updates to thegetCustomFieldsForIssueTypefunction enhance the flexibility and accuracy of ticket field handling. These changes align well with the PR objectives of including a components field and other required system fields.A few minor suggestions were provided for improved documentation and code readability. Once these are addressed, the changes should be ready for merging.
Pull Request
To help us get this pull request reviewed and merged quickly, please be sure to include the following items:
PR Type
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Backward Compatibility
Is this change backward compatible with the most recently released version? Does it introduce changes which might change the user experience in any way? Does it alter the Connector in any way?
Useful links:
Issue Linking
What's new?
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes