Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move web3j logic in executionclient module to a separate package #5475

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 12, 2022

Conversation

StefanBratanov
Copy link
Contributor

@StefanBratanov StefanBratanov commented May 11, 2022

PR Description

Move web3j logic in executionclient module to web3j package inside the module.

Fixed Issue(s)

related to #5396

Documentation

  • I thought about documentation and added the doc-change-required label to this PR if updates are required.

Changelog

  • I thought about adding a changelog entry, and added one if I deemed necessary.

Copy link
Contributor

@ajsutton ajsutton left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

.gitignore Outdated
Comment on lines 32 to 33
web3j/
!**/executionclient/web3j/
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We can probably remove this ignore entirely. I think it used to be there because we generated the deposit contract APIs via web3j but we don't do that anymore.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great, will remove it then. Would be cleaner.

@StefanBratanov StefanBratanov force-pushed the move_web3j_package branch 2 times, most recently from d693211 to d74f7d4 Compare May 12, 2022 09:46
@StefanBratanov StefanBratanov merged commit 3a47c9f into Consensys:master May 12, 2022
@StefanBratanov StefanBratanov deleted the move_web3j_package branch May 12, 2022 11:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants