Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix bug in periodic eval - number of worker not passed to the eval method #1012

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 5, 2022

Conversation

ggraffieti
Copy link
Member

During periodic eval the number of worker was not passed to the eval function, resulting in slow evaluations due to the usage of only one worker for data loading.
Now the number of worker set in the train method is correctly passed through the periodic evaluation resulting in the same performance of the training.

This PR closes #1010

@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 2277089293

  • 8 of 8 (100.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 1 file are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 70.634%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 2275173477: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 12029
Relevant Lines: 17030

💛 - Coveralls

@AntonioCarta AntonioCarta merged commit cfe1ec3 into ContinualAI:master May 5, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Validation during training: time incoherence
3 participants