-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 353
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Snapshot item 2 #418
Snapshot item 2 #418
Conversation
172c2c2
to
f55ce7f
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reorg looks good.
Minor comment on a comment text, and a small addition to test cases.
Feel free to merge once you consider these resolved.
Ok(Some(Some(100))) | ||
); | ||
|
||
// Write a changelog at 4, removing the value |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
removing the value? that doesn't make sense to me
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why not? It would be tantamount to removing the key. It's supported, so I think it must be tested. Also, I like seeing Some(None)
in the results.
These None
cases are also present in the original test for SnapshotMap
AFAIK.
#409 follow-up. Refactors into a
snapshot
module, and addsSnapshot
unit tests.