Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix missing prefix bound types #655

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 14, 2022
Merged

Fix missing prefix bound types #655

merged 2 commits into from
Feb 14, 2022

Conversation

maurolacy
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes a couple of errors with missing bound annotations for IndexedMaps and MultiIndex.

@@ -172,11 +172,11 @@ where
K: PrimaryKey<'a>,
I: IndexList<T>,
{
pub fn sub_prefix(&self, p: K::SubPrefix) -> Prefix<K::SuperSuffix, T> {
pub fn sub_prefix(&self, p: K::SubPrefix) -> Prefix<K::SuperSuffix, T, K::SuperSuffix> {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ugh, so what is 3rd type argument in Prefix again?

pub struct Prefix<K, T, B = Vec<u8>>
where
    K: KeyDeserialize,
    T: Serialize + DeserializeOwned,
{
    storage_prefix: Vec<u8>,
    data: PhantomData<(T, B)>,
    pk_name: Vec<u8>,
    de_fn_kv: DeserializeKvFn<K, T>,
    de_fn_v: DeserializeVFn<T>,
}

It's the actual content of prefix, right?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@maurolacy maurolacy Feb 14, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The 3rd type is precisely the new Bound type annotations. You can compare with Map to get the idea.

While implementing this, made it work for Map, and then forgot about these here and elsewhere (MultiIndex). These bounds have a default of Vec<u8>, that's why it "worked" (passed existing tests).

Adding explicit tests for these typed bounds would be good I guess, at some point.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's a little tricky how all this works. I can give a small overview / talk at some point, if there's interest.

Copy link
Contributor

@ueco-jb ueco-jb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Adding explicit tests for these typed bounds would be good I guess, at some point.

I think this is worth an extra issue as follow up.

@maurolacy maurolacy merged commit 4c4736e into main Feb 14, 2022
@maurolacy maurolacy deleted the fix/prefix-bound-types branch February 14, 2022 08:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants