You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There is CosmWasm gas and Cosmos SDK gas. With 1.0 CosmWasm gas strives to consume 1 Teragas/millisecond on an off-the-shelf Intel machine (e.g. CI machine). Anything significatly cheaper of more expensive (in the order of magnitudes) justifies repricing.
From some very early measurements we set DefaultGasMultiplier to 100 and increased it by a factor of 150_000 because between 0.16 and 1.0 CosmWasm was changed to charge 150_000 instead of 1 gas per Wasm operation. But we don't know accurate this initial 100 is after two years of development.
To refine the multiplier, we should figure out the amount of gas Cosmos SDK consumes per millisecond. This can be done via secp256k1 signature verification. We know it costs 1000 Cosmo SDK gas. We need to benchmark it and calculate the rest from there.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
There is CosmWasm gas and Cosmos SDK gas. With 1.0 CosmWasm gas strives to consume 1 Teragas/millisecond on an off-the-shelf Intel machine (e.g. CI machine). Anything significatly cheaper of more expensive (in the order of magnitudes) justifies repricing.
From some very early measurements we set DefaultGasMultiplier to 100 and increased it by a factor of 150_000 because between 0.16 and 1.0 CosmWasm was changed to charge 150_000 instead of 1 gas per Wasm operation. But we don't know accurate this initial 100 is after two years of development.
To refine the multiplier, we should figure out the amount of gas Cosmos SDK consumes per millisecond. This can be done via secp256k1 signature verification. We know it costs 1000 Cosmo SDK gas. We need to benchmark it and calculate the rest from there.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: