Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgrade comos-sdk version to v0.40.0 final #369

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 11, 2021
Merged

Conversation

alpe
Copy link
Contributor

@alpe alpe commented Jan 11, 2021

Upgrade to final version which includes no code changes to RC7

cosmos/cosmos-sdk@v0.40.0-rc7...v0.40.0

@alpe alpe requested a review from ethanfrey January 11, 2021 06:23
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 11, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #369 (0faf7f2) into master (0093106) will decrease coverage by 0.60%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #369      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   56.56%   55.95%   -0.61%     
==========================================
  Files          34       34              
  Lines        3414     3451      +37     
==========================================
  Hits         1931     1931              
- Misses       1338     1375      +37     
  Partials      145      145              
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
x/wasm/internal/types/types.go 23.52% <0.00%> (-4.25%) ⬇️
x/wasm/internal/types/validation.go 100.00% <0.00%> (+7.69%) ⬆️

Copy link
Member

@ethanfrey ethanfrey left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🚀

@ethanfrey ethanfrey merged commit 456ddae into master Jan 11, 2021
@ethanfrey ethanfrey deleted the sdk_upgrade_0.40.0 branch January 11, 2021 07:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants