Skip to content

Master #17

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 10 commits into from
Closed

Master #17

wants to merge 10 commits into from

Conversation

Imperatorn
Copy link

Experimental

ibuclaw and others added 10 commits March 24, 2021 15:31
gcc/ChangeLog:

	PR d/99691
	* config.gcc (*-*-openbsd*): Add openbsd-d.o.
	* config/t-openbsd: Add openbsd-d.o.
	* config/openbsd-d.c: New file.
All target platforms that could run on SPARC should include this header
in order to avoid errors from memmodel being used in sparc-protos.h.

gcc/ChangeLog:

	* config/freebsd-d.c: Include memmodel.h.
gcc/ChangeLog:

	PR d/91595
	* config.gcc (*-*-cygwin*): Add winnt-d.o
	(*-*-mingw*): Likewise.
	* config/i386/cygwin.h (EXTRA_TARGET_D_OS_VERSIONS): New macro.
	* config/i386/mingw32.h (EXTRA_TARGET_D_OS_VERSIONS): Likewise.
	* config/i386/t-cygming: Add winnt-d.o.
	* config/i386/winnt-d.c: New file.
@Imperatorn Imperatorn closed this Apr 6, 2021
jpf91 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 15, 2021
The fixed error is:

==21166==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: alloc-dealloc-mismatch (operator new [] vs operator delete) on 0x60300000d900
    #0 0x7367d7 in operator delete(void*, unsigned long) /home/marxin/BIG/buildbot/buildworker/marxinbox-gcc-asan/build/libsanitizer/asan/asan_new_delete.cpp:172
    #1 0x3b82e6e in pointer_equiv_analyzer::~pointer_equiv_analyzer() /home/marxin/BIG/buildbot/buildworker/marxinbox-gcc-asan/build/gcc/gimple-ssa-evrp.c:161
    #2 0x3b83387 in hybrid_folder::~hybrid_folder() /home/marxin/BIG/buildbot/buildworker/marxinbox-gcc-asan/build/gcc/gimple-ssa-evrp.c:517
    #3 0x3b83387 in execute_early_vrp /home/marxin/BIG/buildbot/buildworker/marxinbox-gcc-asan/build/gcc/gimple-ssa-evrp.c:686
    #4 0x1790611 in execute_one_pass(opt_pass*) /home/marxin/BIG/buildbot/buildworker/marxinbox-gcc-asan/build/gcc/passes.c:2567
    #5 0x1792003 in execute_pass_list_1 /home/marxin/BIG/buildbot/buildworker/marxinbox-gcc-asan/build/gcc/passes.c:2656
    #6 0x1792029 in execute_pass_list_1 /home/marxin/BIG/buildbot/buildworker/marxinbox-gcc-asan/build/gcc/passes.c:2657
    #7 0x179209f in execute_pass_list(function*, opt_pass*) /home/marxin/BIG/buildbot/buildworker/marxinbox-gcc-asan/build/gcc/passes.c:2667
    #8 0x178a5f3 in do_per_function_toporder(void (*)(function*, void*), void*) /home/marxin/BIG/buildbot/buildworker/marxinbox-gcc-asan/build/gcc/passes.c:1773
    #9 0x1792fac in do_per_function_toporder(void (*)(function*, void*), void*) /home/marxin/BIG/buildbot/buildworker/marxinbox-gcc-asan/build/gcc/plugin.h:191
    #10 0x1792fac in execute_ipa_pass_list(opt_pass*) /home/marxin/BIG/buildbot/buildworker/marxinbox-gcc-asan/build/gcc/passes.c:3001
    #11 0xc525fc in ipa_passes /home/marxin/BIG/buildbot/buildworker/marxinbox-gcc-asan/build/gcc/cgraphunit.c:2154
    #12 0xc525fc in symbol_table::compile() /home/marxin/BIG/buildbot/buildworker/marxinbox-gcc-asan/build/gcc/cgraphunit.c:2289
    #13 0xc5a096 in symbol_table::compile() /home/marxin/BIG/buildbot/buildworker/marxinbox-gcc-asan/build/gcc/cgraphunit.c:2269
    #14 0xc5a096 in symbol_table::finalize_compilation_unit() /home/marxin/BIG/buildbot/buildworker/marxinbox-gcc-asan/build/gcc/cgraphunit.c:2537
    #15 0x1a7a17c in compile_file /home/marxin/BIG/buildbot/buildworker/marxinbox-gcc-asan/build/gcc/toplev.c:482
    #16 0x69c758 in do_compile /home/marxin/BIG/buildbot/buildworker/marxinbox-gcc-asan/build/gcc/toplev.c:2210
    #17 0x69c758 in toplev::main(int, char**) /home/marxin/BIG/buildbot/buildworker/marxinbox-gcc-asan/build/gcc/toplev.c:2349
    #18 0x6a932a in main /home/marxin/BIG/buildbot/buildworker/marxinbox-gcc-asan/build/gcc/main.c:39
    #19 0x7ffff7820b34 in __libc_start_main ../csu/libc-start.c:332
    #20 0x6aa5fd in _start (/home/marxin/BIG/buildbot/buildworker/marxinbox-gcc-asan/objdir/gcc/cc1+0x6aa5fd)

0x60300000d900 is located 0 bytes inside of 32-byte region [0x60300000d900,0x60300000d920)
allocated by thread T0 here:
    #0 0x735ab7 in operator new[](unsigned long) /home/marxin/BIG/buildbot/buildworker/marxinbox-gcc-asan/build/libsanitizer/asan/asan_new_delete.cpp:102
    #1 0x3b82dac in pointer_equiv_analyzer::pointer_equiv_analyzer(gimple_ranger*) /home/marxin/BIG/buildbot/buildworker/marxinbox-gcc-asan/build/gcc/gimple-ssa-evrp.c:156

gcc/ChangeLog:

	* gimple-ssa-evrp.c (pointer_equiv_analyzer::~pointer_equiv_analyzer): Use delete[].
jpf91 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 21, 2025
This is an LRA bug derived from reuse spilling slots after frame pointer spilling.
The slot was created for QImode (1 byte) and it was reused after spilling of the
frame pointer for TImode register (16 bytes long) and it overlaps other slots.

Wrong things happened while `lra_spill ()'
---------------------------- part of lra-spills.cc ----------------------------
  n = assign_spill_hard_regs (pseudo_regnos, n);
  slots_num = 0;
  assign_stack_slot_num_and_sort_pseudos (pseudo_regnos, n);  <--- first call ---
  for (i = 0; i < n; i++)
    if (pseudo_slots[pseudo_regnos[i]].mem == NULL_RTX)
      assign_mem_slot (pseudo_regnos[i]);
  if ((n2 = lra_update_fp2sp_elimination (pseudo_regnos)) > 0)
    {
      /* Assign stack slots to spilled pseudos assigned to fp.  */
      assign_stack_slot_num_and_sort_pseudos (pseudo_regnos, n2);  <--- second call ---
      for (i = 0; i < n2; i++)
	if (pseudo_slots[pseudo_regnos[i]].mem == NULL_RTX)
	  assign_mem_slot (pseudo_regnos[i]);
    }
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In a first call of `assign_stack_slot_num_and_sort_pseudos(...)' LRA allocates slot #17
for r93 (QImode - 1 byte).
In a second call of `assign_stack_slot_num_and_sort_pseudos(...)' LRA reuse slot #17 for
r114 (TImode - 16 bytes).
It's wrong. We can't reuse 1 byte slot #17 for 16 bytes register.

The code in patch does reuse slots only without allocated memory or only with equal or
smaller registers with equal or smaller alignment.
Also, a small fix for debugging output of slot width.
Print slot size as width, not a 0 as a size of (mem/c:BLK (...)).

	PR rtl-optimization/117868
gcc/
	* lra-spills.cc (assign_stack_slot_num_and_sort_pseudos): Reuse slots
	only without allocated memory or only with equal or smaller registers
	with equal or smaller alignment.
	(lra_spill): Print slot size as width.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants