-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[CPDNPQ-2225] qualifications API for TRS - part of DQT decommissioning #2115
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Review app deployed to https://npq-registration-review-2115-web.test.teacherservices.cloud/ |
27a3f2e
to
063224b
Compare
063224b
to
c1077ca
Compare
c1077ca
to
ac39162
Compare
db/migrate/20241105145235_create_legacy_passed_participant_outcomes.rb
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
spec/lib/tasks/one_off/load_legacy_participant_outcomes_spec.rb
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
spec/lib/tasks/one_off/load_legacy_participant_outcomes_spec.rb
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM - couple of comments around schema changes and API path
The actual API format makes me wince a little since this is what JSON:API has include
and entity relationships for but it is following the pattern of our other APIs and does make it simpler to consume for someone just parsing as raw JSON (instead of using a JSON:API client)
ac39162
to
e3f16b4
Compare
e3f16b4
to
1db7239
Compare
9c30a2f
to
4df55a8
Compare
…lt to using lead_provider scope
…th lead_provider scope
4df55a8
to
829188f
Compare
829188f
to
a44338d
Compare
Quality Gate passedIssues Measures |
Context
Ticket: https://dfedigital.atlassian.net/browse/CPDNPQ-2225
Changes proposed in this pull request
scope
to APIToken - this is eitherlead_provider
orteacher_record_service
- and a token from one scope cannot access the APIs from the other scopedocs/qualifications_api.md
)