Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

models/contest: clarify rate_all behaviour #2347

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 18, 2024

Conversation

Riolku
Copy link
Contributor

@Riolku Riolku commented Aug 29, 2024

Rate all is confusingly named, since it really means "rate even users who don't submit". In my opinion, this should have been the default, but instead we can simply fix the description.

Rate all is confusingly named, since it really means "rate even users
who don't submit". In my opinion, this should have been the default, but
instead we can simply fix the description.
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 46.73%. Comparing base (fd7fb05) to head (c181ab9).
Report is 17 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2347      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   46.76%   46.73%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         251      254       +3     
  Lines       13317    13394      +77     
==========================================
+ Hits         6228     6260      +32     
- Misses       7089     7134      +45     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Member

@kiritofeng kiritofeng left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks!

@kiritofeng kiritofeng added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 18, 2024
Merged via the queue into DMOJ:master with commit 80d7dcb Dec 18, 2024
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants