Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Robustness of 4DModel? #17

Open
dingmiaomiao opened this issue Sep 22, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Robustness of 4DModel? #17

dingmiaomiao opened this issue Sep 22, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@dingmiaomiao
Copy link

Thank you for your work. I noticed that RoboBEV tested methods like BEVFormer using past frames. The RoboBEV dataset has only sample corruption. If the past frames are fine but the current frame is corrupted, it won’t reflect the true robustness of the 4D models. In real situations, both past and current frames should have the same corruption. How do you test the 4D model? Can you provide more details? Thanks!

@Daniel-xsy
Copy link
Owner

Thanks for your interest.

BEVFormer stores a history BEV feature inside the model, we follow the same evaluation protocol as testing on the original scenes dataset. Therefore, all the input (including past frames and current frames) are both corrupted data. This should reflect the real corruption situations.

It should be noted that since RoboBEV only corrupts sample data (not sweep), we use corrupted sample data as previous frames instead of using corrupted current sample and previous clean sweep data.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants