-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 142
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
⚡️ [RUMF-1113] Notify performance entries by batch #1255
Merged
amortemousque
merged 8 commits into
main
from
aymeric/notify-performance-entries-by-batch
Jan 18, 2022
Merged
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
d9ae0ff
⚡️ Notify performance entry by batch
amortemousque 361a562
Update performance entry event subscription
amortemousque cc0c09c
👌 Use find instead of loop
amortemousque 6b84bb8
Improve comments
amortemousque 35ed8d1
👌 Fix LCP + simplify first input
amortemousque c671fa4
👌 Filter in handleRumPerformanceEntries
amortemousque 043fa95
Merge branch 'main' into aymeric/notify-performance-entries-by-batch
amortemousque 546fbb4
Fix check
amortemousque File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💬 suggestion: I find it a bit confusing to have different levels of filtering. Maybe this function could be used similarly to
isIncompleteNavigation
andisForbiddenResource
? Or maybe we could simply remove it and let subscribers do the check themselves...There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
filterRumPerformanceEntries
filters first because it garantes that the rest of the code deals only with RumPerformanceEntry. Maybe a different naming would be better?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
+1
we could also have a
filterRumAllowedPerformanceEntries
that do all filtering operationsThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💬 suggestion: Also you could use a
isRumPerformanceEntry(entry: PerformanceEntry): entry is RumPerformanceEntry
to have a nice typeguard without needing to castas unknown as RumPerformanceEntry
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The type guard does not work because there is no type relation between PerformanceEntry and RumPerformanceEntry. Also having a single filterRumAllowedPerformanceEntries where there is every check is weird since we can have
PerformanceEntry[]
orRumPerformanceEntry[]
as input.I identified two possible options:
filterRumAllowedPerformanceEntries(entries: Array<PerformanceEntry | RumPerformanceEntry>)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I changed the implementation according to what we said during the daily. Let me know what you think.