-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 143
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
⚗️ [RUMF-1181] collect telemetry events #1351
Closed
Closed
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
67bc5e1
update internalMonitoring to handle new telemetry events
bcaudan 982df2d
add telemetry event to RUM batch
bcaudan d935cd9
♻️ expose startMonitoringBatch
bcaudan 5f884b7
Create a "RUM" batch for telemetry events in logs
bcaudan 5032033
Merge branch 'main' into bcaudan/telemetry-exp
bcaudan 7f21383
👌 remove explicit cast
bcaudan dee6ae4
👌 use timeStampNow
bcaudan 3c7f20c
👌 remove useless ?
bcaudan File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💭 thought: This is interesting, because now this function has no "monitoring"-related logic, and could be use in other places (could be factorized with
startLoggerBatch
orstartRumBatch
with a bit of changes). TheBatch
class could be seen as an internal implementation detail, and this new generic function could be used instead.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Indeed,
startLoggerBatch
andstartMonitoringBatch
were almost the same thing 🤔I had in mind to only keep this abstraction while having both systems but we could use that for logs as well and keep it.
For RUM, it seems a bit trickier since there are more behaviors related to the batch (upsert, unload, replica app id).
Wdyt of only mutualizing that with logs?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Indeed, for RUM it is trickier. I would still factorize it though:
upsert
andunload
are implemented inBatch
, so it wouldn't hurt to expose it through the more abstractstartBatch
function.replicaContext
It could be done in a future task though