Regenerate client from commit 2d1ebbf0 of spec repo

DataDog · Jun 27, 2022 · 9846ead · 9846ead
1 parent 41c071a
commit 9846ead
Show file tree

Hide file tree

Showing 5 changed files with 61 additions and 8 deletions.
diff --git a/.apigentools-info b/.apigentools-info
@@ -4,13 +4,13 @@
     "spec_versions": {
         "v1": {
             "apigentools_version": "1.6.2",
-            "regenerated": "2022-06-27 13:32:29.495533",
-            "spec_repo_commit": "773b3560"
+            "regenerated": "2022-06-27 16:07:21.172854",
+            "spec_repo_commit": "2d1ebbf0"
         },
         "v2": {
             "apigentools_version": "1.6.2",
-            "regenerated": "2022-06-27 13:32:29.513761",
-            "spec_repo_commit": "773b3560"
+            "regenerated": "2022-06-27 16:07:21.185406",
+            "spec_repo_commit": "2d1ebbf0"
         }
     }
 }
diff --git a/.generator/schemas/v2/openapi.yaml b/.generator/schemas/v2/openapi.yaml
@@ -6340,6 +6340,17 @@ components:
       - cases
       - message
       type: object
+    SecurityMonitoringRuleDecreaseCriticalityBasedOnEnv:
+      description: 'If true, signals in non-production environments have a lower severity
+        than what is defined by the rule case, which can reduce signal noise.
+
+        The severity is decreased by one level: `CRITICAL` in production becomes `HIGH`
+        in non-production, `HIGH` becomes `MEDIUM` and so on. `INFO` remains `INFO`.
+
+        The decrement is applied when the environment tag of the signal starts with
+        `staging`, `test` or `dev`.'
+      example: false
+      type: boolean
     SecurityMonitoringRuleDetectionMethod:
       description: The detection method.
       enum:
@@ -6533,6 +6544,8 @@ components:
     SecurityMonitoringRuleOptions:
       description: Options on rules.
       properties:
+        decreaseCriticalityBasedOnEnv:
+          $ref: '#/components/schemas/SecurityMonitoringRuleDecreaseCriticalityBasedOnEnv'
         detectionMethod:
           $ref: '#/components/schemas/SecurityMonitoringRuleDetectionMethod'
         evaluationWindow:

diff --git a/examples/v2/security-monitoring/UpdateSecurityMonitoringRule.java b/examples/v2/security-monitoring/UpdateSecurityMonitoringRule.java
@@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ public static void main(String[] args) {
             .hasExtendedTitle(true)
             .options(
                 new SecurityMonitoringRuleOptions()
+                    .decreaseCriticalityBasedOnEnv(false)
                     .detectionMethod(SecurityMonitoringRuleDetectionMethod.THRESHOLD)
                     .evaluationWindow(SecurityMonitoringRuleEvaluationWindow.ZERO_MINUTES)
                     .hardcodedEvaluatorType(SecurityMonitoringRuleHardcodedEvaluatorType.LOG4SHELL)

diff --git a/src/main/java/com/datadog/api/v2/client/model/SecurityMonitoringRuleOptions.java b/src/main/java/com/datadog/api/v2/client/model/SecurityMonitoringRuleOptions.java
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
 
 /** Options on rules. */
 @JsonPropertyOrder({
+  SecurityMonitoringRuleOptions.JSON_PROPERTY_DECREASE_CRITICALITY_BASED_ON_ENV,
   SecurityMonitoringRuleOptions.JSON_PROPERTY_DETECTION_METHOD,
   SecurityMonitoringRuleOptions.JSON_PROPERTY_EVALUATION_WINDOW,
   SecurityMonitoringRuleOptions.JSON_PROPERTY_HARDCODED_EVALUATOR_TYPE,
@@ -26,6 +27,10 @@
     value = "https://github.com/DataDog/datadog-api-client-java/blob/master/.generator")
 public class SecurityMonitoringRuleOptions {
   @JsonIgnore public boolean unparsed = false;
+  public static final String JSON_PROPERTY_DECREASE_CRITICALITY_BASED_ON_ENV =
+      "decreaseCriticalityBasedOnEnv";
+  private Boolean decreaseCriticalityBasedOnEnv;
+
   public static final String JSON_PROPERTY_DETECTION_METHOD = "detectionMethod";
   private SecurityMonitoringRuleDetectionMethod detectionMethod;
 
@@ -47,6 +52,33 @@ public class SecurityMonitoringRuleOptions {
   public static final String JSON_PROPERTY_NEW_VALUE_OPTIONS = "newValueOptions";
   private SecurityMonitoringRuleNewValueOptions newValueOptions;
 
+  public SecurityMonitoringRuleOptions decreaseCriticalityBasedOnEnv(
+      Boolean decreaseCriticalityBasedOnEnv) {
+    this.decreaseCriticalityBasedOnEnv = decreaseCriticalityBasedOnEnv;
+    return this;
+  }
+
+  /**
+   * If true, signals in non-production environments have a lower severity than what is defined by
+   * the rule case, which can reduce signal noise. The severity is decreased by one level: <code>
+   * CRITICAL</code> in production becomes <code>HIGH</code> in non-production, <code>HIGH</code>
+   * becomes <code>MEDIUM</code> and so on. <code>INFO</code> remains <code>INFO</code>. The
+   * decrement is applied when the environment tag of the signal starts with <code>staging</code>,
+   * <code>test</code> or <code>dev</code>.
+   *
+   * @return decreaseCriticalityBasedOnEnv
+   */
+  @javax.annotation.Nullable
+  @JsonProperty(JSON_PROPERTY_DECREASE_CRITICALITY_BASED_ON_ENV)
+  @JsonInclude(value = JsonInclude.Include.USE_DEFAULTS)
+  public Boolean getDecreaseCriticalityBasedOnEnv() {
+    return decreaseCriticalityBasedOnEnv;
+  }
+
+  public void setDecreaseCriticalityBasedOnEnv(Boolean decreaseCriticalityBasedOnEnv) {
+    this.decreaseCriticalityBasedOnEnv = decreaseCriticalityBasedOnEnv;
+  }
+
   public SecurityMonitoringRuleOptions detectionMethod(
       SecurityMonitoringRuleDetectionMethod detectionMethod) {
     this.detectionMethod = detectionMethod;
@@ -237,7 +269,10 @@ public boolean equals(Object o) {
       return false;
     }
     SecurityMonitoringRuleOptions securityMonitoringRuleOptions = (SecurityMonitoringRuleOptions) o;
-    return Objects.equals(this.detectionMethod, securityMonitoringRuleOptions.detectionMethod)
+    return Objects.equals(
+            this.decreaseCriticalityBasedOnEnv,
+            securityMonitoringRuleOptions.decreaseCriticalityBasedOnEnv)
+        && Objects.equals(this.detectionMethod, securityMonitoringRuleOptions.detectionMethod)
         && Objects.equals(this.evaluationWindow, securityMonitoringRuleOptions.evaluationWindow)
         && Objects.equals(
             this.hardcodedEvaluatorType, securityMonitoringRuleOptions.hardcodedEvaluatorType)
@@ -251,6 +286,7 @@ public boolean equals(Object o) {
   @Override
   public int hashCode() {
     return Objects.hash(
+        decreaseCriticalityBasedOnEnv,
         detectionMethod,
         evaluationWindow,
         hardcodedEvaluatorType,
@@ -264,6 +300,9 @@ public int hashCode() {
   public String toString() {
     StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder();
     sb.append("class SecurityMonitoringRuleOptions {\n");
+    sb.append("    decreaseCriticalityBasedOnEnv: ")
+        .append(toIndentedString(decreaseCriticalityBasedOnEnv))
+        .append("\n");
     sb.append("    detectionMethod: ").append(toIndentedString(detectionMethod)).append("\n");
     sb.append("    evaluationWindow: ").append(toIndentedString(evaluationWindow)).append("\n");
     sb.append("    hardcodedEvaluatorType: ")

diff --git a/src/test/resources/com/datadog/api/v2/client/api/security_monitoring.feature b/src/test/resources/com/datadog/api/v2/client/api/security_monitoring.feature
@@ -226,22 +226,22 @@ Feature: Security Monitoring
   Scenario: Update an existing rule returns "Bad Request" response
     Given new "UpdateSecurityMonitoringRule" request
     And request contains "rule_id" parameter from "REPLACE.ME"
-    And body with value {"cases": [{"notifications": [], "status": "critical"}], "filters": [{"action": "require"}], "hasExtendedTitle": true, "options": {"detectionMethod": "threshold", "evaluationWindow": 0, "hardcodedEvaluatorType": "log4shell", "impossibleTravelOptions": {"baselineUserLocations": true}, "keepAlive": 0, "maxSignalDuration": 0, "newValueOptions": {"forgetAfter": 1, "learningDuration": 0, "learningMethod": "duration", "learningThreshold": 0}}, "queries": [{"aggregation": "count", "distinctFields": [], "groupByFields": []}], "tags": [], "version": 1}
+    And body with value {"cases": [{"notifications": [], "status": "critical"}], "filters": [{"action": "require"}], "hasExtendedTitle": true, "options": {"decreaseCriticalityBasedOnEnv": false, "detectionMethod": "threshold", "evaluationWindow": 0, "hardcodedEvaluatorType": "log4shell", "impossibleTravelOptions": {"baselineUserLocations": true}, "keepAlive": 0, "maxSignalDuration": 0, "newValueOptions": {"forgetAfter": 1, "learningDuration": 0, "learningMethod": "duration", "learningThreshold": 0}}, "queries": [{"aggregation": "count", "distinctFields": [], "groupByFields": []}], "tags": [], "version": 1}
     When the request is sent
     Then the response status is 400 Bad Request
 
   @generated @skip @team:DataDog/k9-cloud-security-platform
   Scenario: Update an existing rule returns "Not Found" response
     Given new "UpdateSecurityMonitoringRule" request
     And request contains "rule_id" parameter from "REPLACE.ME"
-    And body with value {"cases": [{"notifications": [], "status": "critical"}], "filters": [{"action": "require"}], "hasExtendedTitle": true, "options": {"detectionMethod": "threshold", "evaluationWindow": 0, "hardcodedEvaluatorType": "log4shell", "impossibleTravelOptions": {"baselineUserLocations": true}, "keepAlive": 0, "maxSignalDuration": 0, "newValueOptions": {"forgetAfter": 1, "learningDuration": 0, "learningMethod": "duration", "learningThreshold": 0}}, "queries": [{"aggregation": "count", "distinctFields": [], "groupByFields": []}], "tags": [], "version": 1}
+    And body with value {"cases": [{"notifications": [], "status": "critical"}], "filters": [{"action": "require"}], "hasExtendedTitle": true, "options": {"decreaseCriticalityBasedOnEnv": false, "detectionMethod": "threshold", "evaluationWindow": 0, "hardcodedEvaluatorType": "log4shell", "impossibleTravelOptions": {"baselineUserLocations": true}, "keepAlive": 0, "maxSignalDuration": 0, "newValueOptions": {"forgetAfter": 1, "learningDuration": 0, "learningMethod": "duration", "learningThreshold": 0}}, "queries": [{"aggregation": "count", "distinctFields": [], "groupByFields": []}], "tags": [], "version": 1}
     When the request is sent
     Then the response status is 404 Not Found
 
   @generated @skip @team:DataDog/k9-cloud-security-platform
   Scenario: Update an existing rule returns "OK" response
     Given new "UpdateSecurityMonitoringRule" request
     And request contains "rule_id" parameter from "REPLACE.ME"
-    And body with value {"cases": [{"notifications": [], "status": "critical"}], "filters": [{"action": "require"}], "hasExtendedTitle": true, "options": {"detectionMethod": "threshold", "evaluationWindow": 0, "hardcodedEvaluatorType": "log4shell", "impossibleTravelOptions": {"baselineUserLocations": true}, "keepAlive": 0, "maxSignalDuration": 0, "newValueOptions": {"forgetAfter": 1, "learningDuration": 0, "learningMethod": "duration", "learningThreshold": 0}}, "queries": [{"aggregation": "count", "distinctFields": [], "groupByFields": []}], "tags": [], "version": 1}
+    And body with value {"cases": [{"notifications": [], "status": "critical"}], "filters": [{"action": "require"}], "hasExtendedTitle": true, "options": {"decreaseCriticalityBasedOnEnv": false, "detectionMethod": "threshold", "evaluationWindow": 0, "hardcodedEvaluatorType": "log4shell", "impossibleTravelOptions": {"baselineUserLocations": true}, "keepAlive": 0, "maxSignalDuration": 0, "newValueOptions": {"forgetAfter": 1, "learningDuration": 0, "learningMethod": "duration", "learningThreshold": 0}}, "queries": [{"aggregation": "count", "distinctFields": [], "groupByFields": []}], "tags": [], "version": 1}
     When the request is sent
     Then the response status is 200 OK