Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add metadata to checks.Check #73

Closed
alq666 opened this issue Jun 11, 2012 · 2 comments
Closed

Add metadata to checks.Check #73

alq666 opened this issue Jun 11, 2012 · 2 comments
Assignees
@alq666
Labels
checks feature
Milestone
2.2.27

Comments

@alq666
Copy link
Member

alq666 commented Jun 11, 2012

Allow the recording of metadata for a metric and update self.get_metrics accordingly.
@ghost ghost assigned alq666 Jun 18, 2012
@alq666
Copy link
Member Author

alq666 commented Jun 18, 2012

See #79

@alq666
Copy link
Member Author

alq666 commented Jun 20, 2012

Released in 2.2.27

@alq666 alq666 closed this as completed Jun 20, 2012
yannmh added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 15, 2015
@yannmh
[jxmfetch] no sc warns on metric limit violation
2e16699 
Do not send service check warnings on metric limit violation. See
[#73](DataDog/jmxfetch#73).

Update CHANGELOG to reflect changes.
yannmh added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 15, 2015
@yannmh
[jmxfetch] no sc warns on metric limit violation
dd68013 
Do not send service check warnings on metric limit violation. See
[#73](DataDog/jmxfetch#73).

Update CHANGELOG to reflect changes.
urosgruber pushed a commit to urosgruber/dd-agent that referenced this issue Dec 23, 2015
@yannmh @urosgruber
[jmxfetch] no sc warns on metric limit violation
c02f958 
Do not send service check warnings on metric limit violation. See
[DataDog#73](DataDog/jmxfetch#73).

Update CHANGELOG to reflect changes.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@alq666 alq666

Labels
checks feature
Projects
None yet
Milestone
2.2.27
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@alq666