Update CHANGELOG to mention YJIT stat tracking

[HeyNonster]

In #2711, I forgot to include an update to the CHANGELOG.

What does this PR do?
Only updates the CHANGELOG.

Motivation
Wanting to mention the YJIT stat tracking so that folks interested in tracking them don't miss it.

Additional Notes
n/a

How to test the change?
n/a documentation only

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #2959 (c91f297) into master (4890f92) will increase coverage by 0.10%.
The diff coverage is 99.04%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2959      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   97.96%   98.07%   +0.10%     
==========================================
  Files        1287     1301      +14     
  Lines       71025    71825     +800     
  Branches     3285     3307      +22     
==========================================
+ Hits        69581    70442     +861     
+ Misses       1444     1383      -61     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
lib/datadog/appsec/contrib/devise/patcher.rb	69.56% <ø> (-2.44%)	⬇️
lib/datadog/tracing/contrib/opensearch/quantize.rb	94.44% <94.44%> (ø)
lib/datadog/tracing/contrib/opensearch/patcher.rb	96.92% <96.92%> (ø)
...datadog/tracing/contrib/opensearch/patcher_spec.rb	99.23% <99.23%> (ø)
lib/datadog/appsec/contrib/devise/event.rb	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...ec/contrib/devise/patcher/authenticatable_patch.rb	100.00% <100.00%> (+75.67%)	⬆️
...ib/devise/patcher/registration_controller_patch.rb	100.00% <100.00%> (+68.96%)	⬆️
lib/datadog/kit/appsec/events.rb	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
lib/datadog/profiling/component.rb	97.67% <100.00%> (+0.11%)	⬆️
lib/datadog/profiling/load_native_extension.rb	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
... and 11 more

... and 7 files with indirect coverage changes

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

[marcotc]

👋, @HeyNonster, we normally build the changelog from GitHub pull request titles and descriptions when we are preparing a new release.

It's totally ok to have it added now (and helpful); I just wanted to let you know that this entry wasn't technically missing from the original PR (our regular process doesn't require it at PR time.)

[HeyNonster]

👋, @HeyNonster, we normally build the changelog from GitHub pull request titles and descriptions when we are preparing a new release.

It's totally ok to have it added now (and helpful); I just wanted to let you know that this entry wasn't technically missing from the original PR (our regular process doesn't require it at PR time.)

Awesome, thanks @marcotc :)

[delner]

@marcotc What's the resolution on this one? Should we merge or close this?

[marcotc]

Merge it! 👍