Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update rubocop for appraisals #3155

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 25, 2023
Merged

Conversation

TonyCTHsu
Copy link
Contributor

@TonyCTHsu TonyCTHsu commented Sep 25, 2023

What does this PR do?

This PR propagates previous changes for rubocop to appraisal dependencies.

https://github.com/DataDog/dd-trace-rb/pull/3147/files#diff-d09ea66f8227784ff4393d88a19836f321c915ae10031d16c93d67e6283ab55f

@TonyCTHsu TonyCTHsu marked this pull request as ready for review September 25, 2023 19:23
@TonyCTHsu TonyCTHsu requested a review from a team as a code owner September 25, 2023 19:23
Copy link
Contributor

@ekump ekump left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry about this! I had no idea this needed to be done when updating gems.

@TonyCTHsu TonyCTHsu merged commit 385d2fa into master Sep 25, 2023
177 checks passed
@TonyCTHsu TonyCTHsu deleted the tonycthsu/rubocop-appraisals branch September 25, 2023 19:45
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the 1.15.0 milestone Sep 25, 2023
@ivoanjo
Copy link
Member

ivoanjo commented Sep 26, 2023

Sorry about this! I had no idea this needed to be done when updating gems.

Technically, it shouldn't! It doesn't make a lot of sense, actually -- none of the tests we run depends on rubocop, it's just an artifact of how it's setup currently. (Which would be cool to fix, thus reducing a bunch of noise on the appraisals :D )

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants