-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 373
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Convert OTel semantic convention to Datadog's #3273
Conversation
Codecov ReportAttention:
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #3273 +/- ##
========================================
Coverage 98.22% 98.22%
========================================
Files 1253 1253
Lines 72290 72393 +103
Branches 3361 3393 +32
========================================
+ Hits 71009 71111 +102
- Misses 1281 1282 +1 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
# semantic convention for span kind and span attributes. | ||
# @see https://opentelemetry.io/docs/specs/semconv/general/trace/ | ||
|
||
# rubocop:disable Metrics/CyclomaticComplexity,Metrics/PerceivedComplexity |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Perhaps we could revisit this later to break this method into smaller pieces.
kwargs[:service] = attributes['service.name'] if attributes.key?('service.name') | ||
kwargs[:type] = attributes['span.type'] if attributes.key?('span.type') | ||
|
||
attributes.reject! { |key, _| OpenTelemetry::Trace::Span::DATADOG_SPAN_ATTRIBUTE_OVERRIDES.include?(key) } | ||
|
||
# DEV: There's no `flat_map!`; we have to split it into two operations |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For later: Would it be possible to complete this with a single operation with reduce
or each_with_object
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is an interesting line because I built it to support arbitrarily nested arrays, but that's actually not required for OTel, so I might simplify it later. But I wasn't able to in time for this PR.
What does this PR do?
This PR parses the relevant OpenTelemetry semantic conventions for tracing and converts those values into appropriate Datadog APM values.
Most changes come from parsing OTel Span attributes to derive a Datadog Span operation name.
For example, from Semantic Conventions for Database Client Calls:
If an OTel span has the attribute
db.system
and the Span kind:client
,then the respective Datadog Span will have the operation name
"#{otel_span.attributes['db.system']}.query"
.This PR also introduces a few reserved attributes that can be set on an OTel Span to modify a Datadog Span field, for example
resource.name
can be set to modify the Datadog Span's resource name.There are also a few fixes to attribute parsing, for cross-language consistency.
Motivation:
OpenTelemetry consistent, both with the OpenTelemetry semantic conventions and with other Datadog APM languages.
How to test the change?
There are unit test and system-tests for this change: DataDog/system-tests#1456
For Datadog employees:
credentials of any kind, I've requested a review from
@DataDog/security-design-and-guidance
.Unsure? Have a question? Request a review!