Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Backport 7.60.x] Bump confluent-kafka to 2.6.1 to address CVE #19116

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 25, 2024

Conversation

datadog-agent-integrations-bot[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

Backport 1435476 from #19099.


What does this PR do?

https://datadoghq.atlassian.net/browse/AI-4128

This updates confluent-kafka builders and dependency to address this CVE

https://github.com/confluentinc/librdkafka/releases/tag/v2.6.1

Motivation

Review checklist (to be filled by reviewers)

  • Feature or bugfix MUST have appropriate tests (unit, integration, e2e)
  • Add the qa/skip-qa label if the PR doesn't need to be tested during QA.
  • If you need to backport this PR to another branch, you can add the backport/<branch-name> label to the PR and it will automatically open a backport PR once this one is merged

* Bump confluent-kafka to 2.6.1 to address CVE

* Add changelog

* Override confluent-kafka license (#19100)

(cherry picked from commit 1435476)
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 22, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 87.02%. Comparing base (a242726) to head (341ebba).
Report is 3 commits behind head on 7.60.x.

Additional details and impacted files
Flag Coverage Δ
activemq ?
cassandra ?
hive ?
hivemq ?
hudi ?
ignite ?
jboss_wildfly ?
kafka ?
kafka_consumer 93.58% <ø> (+2.10%) ⬆️
presto ?
solr ?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

---- 🚨 Try these New Features:

@HadhemiDD HadhemiDD merged commit e4a689e into 7.60.x Nov 25, 2024
33 of 34 checks passed
@HadhemiDD HadhemiDD deleted the backport-19099-to-7.60.x branch November 25, 2024 08:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants