Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

symbolic functions and no semantic interposition #68

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

richardstartin
Copy link
Contributor

What does this PR do?:

Motivation:

Additional Notes:

How to test the change?:

For Datadog employees:

  • If this PR touches code that signs or publishes builds or packages, or handles
    credentials of any kind, I've requested a review from @DataDog/security-design-and-guidance.
  • This PR doesn't touch any of that.

Unsure? Have a question? Request a review!

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 1, 2024

🔧 Report generated by pr-comment-cppcheck

CppCheck Report

Warnings (5)

Style Violations (164)

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 1, 2024

🔧 Report generated by pr-comment-scanbuild

Scan-Build Report

User:runner@fv-az1501-326
Working Directory:/home/runner/work/java-profiler/java-profiler/ddprof-lib/src/test/make
Command Line:make -j4 clean all
Clang Version:Ubuntu clang version 14.0.0-1ubuntu1.1
Date:Thu Feb 1 16:31:18 2024

Bug Summary

Bug TypeQuantityDisplay?
All Bugs6
Logic error
Assigned value is garbage or undefined1
Dereference of null pointer2
Result of operation is garbage or undefined1
Unused code
Dead initialization1
Dead nested assignment1

Reports

Bug Group Bug Type ▾ File Function/Method Line Path Length
Logic errorAssigned value is garbage or undefineddwarf.cppparseInstructions23520
Unused codeDead initializationlivenessTracker.cppcleanup_table451
Unused codeDead nested assignmentvmStructs.cppcheckNativeBinding8181
Logic errorDereference of null pointerflightRecorder.cppflush14098
Logic errorDereference of null pointersafeAccess.hload3518
Logic errorResult of operation is garbage or undefineddwarf.hgetSLeb14225

@richardstartin richardstartin changed the title symbol functions and no semantic interposition symbolic functions and no semantic interposition Feb 1, 2024
@jbachorik
Copy link
Collaborator

@CodiumAI-Agent /review

@CodiumAI-Agent
Copy link

PR Analysis

  • 🎯 Main theme: The PR seems to be about modifying linker flags, possibly to symbolize functions and prevent semantic interposition.
  • 📝 PR summary: This PR appears to be making changes to linker flags, presumably to symbolize functions and prevent semantic interposition. However, without any code diff or further context, it's hard to provide a more accurate summary.
  • 📌 Type of PR: Enhancement
  • 🧪 Relevant tests added: Not applicable
  • ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]: 1, because there is no code diff provided in the PR, hence no code to review.
  • 🔒 Security concerns: Not applicable, as there is no code diff provided in the PR.

PR Feedback

💡 General suggestions: It would be helpful if the PR description provided more context about the changes being made. This could include the motivation behind the changes, what the changes are expected to achieve, and how they can be tested. It's also recommended to include a code diff in the PR so that the changes can be reviewed.


✨ Usage guide:

Overview:
The review tool scans the PR code changes, and generates a PR review. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on any PR.
When commenting, to edit configurations related to the review tool (pr_reviewer section), use the following template:

/review --pr_reviewer.some_config1=... --pr_reviewer.some_config2=...

With a configuration file, use the following template:

[pr_reviewer]
some_config1=...
some_config2=...
Utilizing extra instructions

The review tool can be configured with extra instructions, which can be used to guide the model to a feedback tailored to the needs of your project.

Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Specify the relevant sub-tool, and the relevant aspects of the PR that you want to emphasize.

Examples for extra instructions:

[pr_reviewer] # /review #
extra_instructions="""
In the code feedback section, emphasize the following:
- Does the code logic cover relevant edge cases?
- Is the code logic clear and easy to understand?
- Is the code logic efficient?
...
"""

Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable.

How to enable\disable automation
  • When you first install PR-Agent app, the default mode for the review tool is:
pr_commands = ["/review", ...]

meaning the review tool will run automatically on every PR, with the default configuration.
Edit this field to enable/disable the tool, or to change the used configurations

About the 'Code feedback' section

The review tool provides several type of feedbacks, one of them is code suggestions.
If you are interested only in the code suggestions, it is recommended to use the improve feature instead, since it dedicated only to code suggestions, and usually gives better results.
Use the review tool if you want to get a more comprehensive feedback, which includes code suggestions as well.

Auto-labels

The review tool can auto-generate two specific types of labels for a PR:

  • a possible security issue label, that detects possible security issues (enable_review_labels_security flag)
  • a Review effort [1-5]: x label, where x is the estimated effort to review the PR (enable_review_labels_effort flag)
Extra sub-tools

The review tool provides a collection of possible feedbacks about a PR.
It is recommended to review the possible options, and choose the ones relevant for your use case.
Some of the feature that are disabled by default are quite useful, and should be considered for enabling. For example:
require_score_review, require_soc2_review, enable_review_labels_effort, and more.

More PR-Agent commands

To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands:

  • /review: Request a review of your Pull Request.
  • /describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.
  • /improve [--extended]: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback.
  • /ask <QUESTION>: Ask a question about the PR.
  • /update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents.
  • /add_docs 💎: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR.
  • /generate_labels 💎: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents.
  • /analyze 💎: Automatically analyzes the PR, and presents changes walkthrough for each component.

See the tools guide for more details.
To list the possible configuration parameters, add a /config comment.

See the review usage page for a comprehensive guide on using this tool.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants