Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: fix doc generation workflow #516

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

RomainMuller
Copy link
Contributor

The documentation generation workflow was failing because it still referred to the go generate task from the old built-ins package.

The documentation generation workflow was failing because it still
referred to the `go generate` task from the old built-ins package.
@RomainMuller RomainMuller requested a review from a team as a code owner January 28, 2025 08:59
@RomainMuller RomainMuller added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 28, 2025
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Jan 28, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 28, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 72.96%. Comparing base (195149f) to head (8da7b79).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #516      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   71.78%   72.96%   +1.17%     
==========================================
  Files         105      105              
  Lines        5437     5437              
==========================================
+ Hits         3903     3967      +64     
+ Misses       1074      989      -85     
- Partials      460      481      +21     
Components Coverage Δ
Generators 83.23% <ø> (ø)
Instruments ∅ <ø> (∅)
Go Driver 78.29% <ø> (ø)
Toolexec Driver 73.62% <ø> (ø)
Aspects 79.05% <ø> (ø)
Injector 77.35% <ø> (ø)
Job Server 73.91% <ø> (+3.64%) ⬆️
Other 72.96% <ø> (+1.17%) ⬆️

see 2 files with indirect coverage changes

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants