[FAQ Bot] UPDATE: PGCLI - no pq wrapper available (MacOS UV alternative) #63
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
📝 FAQ UPDATE
Course: data-engineering-zoomcamp
Section: module-1 (MacOS-specific UV approach complements the existing Linux/macOS guidance and should live under the same PGCLI pq-wrapper issue to keep related fixes together.)
Related Issue: #62
Question
PGCLI - no pq wrapper available (MacOS UV alternative)
Decision Rationale
The MacOS/Python 3.13 UV-based workaround for psycopg[binary] adds a platform-specific path missing from the current PGCLI pq-wrapper guidance. Integrating it with the existing PGCLI content provides a complete, cross-platform solution without duplicating elsewhere.
Placement Details
module-10d73dde53e🤖 Generated by FAQ Bot
Closes #62