Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix to add cpu architecture suffix to artifact name of cljstyle #101

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 9, 2024

Conversation

hatappo
Copy link
Contributor

@hatappo hatappo commented Jan 8, 2024

To fix the issue: #100

Thank you for maintaining a great workflow like this repository. We always appreciate your work.

@DeLaGuardo
Copy link
Owner

LGTM! thanks)

Before merging, could you run npm run all and commit changed sources? This command will run a few tests and compile .ts to .js files.

@hatappo
Copy link
Contributor Author

hatappo commented Jan 9, 2024

I did not take care of the test cases. My apologies.

I modified the test code as well to accommodate the logic changes and also committed the built artifacts.
(Should I add a test case for boundary conditions by version number? If so, please let me know.)

${'foobar'} | ${`cljstyle_1.2.3_linux.zip`}
${'darwin'} | ${`cljstyle_1.2.3_macos_amd64.zip`}
${'linux'} | ${`cljstyle_1.2.3_linux_amd64.zip`}
${'foobar'} | ${`cljstyle_1.2.3_linux_amd64.zip`}
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

could you add a test case to cover version below 0.15?
Nothing fancy, just the same test with 0.2.3 should do it

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I added a parameter to test older versions as well. Does this change deviate from your intended implementation?

Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

no, it looks perfect, thanks

@DeLaGuardo DeLaGuardo merged commit 95652ba into DeLaGuardo:main Jan 9, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants