Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature/gridedit 902 revalidating curvi tests #307

Merged
merged 16 commits into from
Mar 12, 2024

Conversation

lucacarniato
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Use correct rows forNumM and columns for NumN
Change CurvilinearGridNodeIndices
Fix CurvilinearGrid class
Fix CurvilinearGridLineAttractionRepulsion
@lucacarniato lucacarniato requested a review from BillSenior March 11, 2024 08:45
@lucacarniato lucacarniato marked this pull request as ready for review March 11, 2024 09:35
Copy link
Contributor

@BillSenior BillSenior left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have only the one comment.

Comment on lines +103 to +106
CurvilinearGridNodeIndices currentNode{
m_lines[0].IsMGridLine() ? i : node.m_n,
m_lines[0].IsMGridLine() ? node.m_m : i,
};
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it correct that the test is

 m_lines[0].Is**M**GridLine()

For both the m and n direcitons?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes

@lucacarniato lucacarniato requested a review from BillSenior March 12, 2024 13:37
@lucacarniato lucacarniato merged commit 43a4803 into master Mar 12, 2024
11 of 12 checks passed
@lucacarniato lucacarniato deleted the feature/GRIDEDIT-902_revalidating_curvi_tests branch March 12, 2024 13:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants