Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tweak EPICS backend record initialisation logic #29

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 11, 2024

Conversation

GDYendell
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 5, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 2 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 43.86%. Comparing base (f887045) to head (9ae4f7a).

Files Patch % Lines
src/fastcs/backends/epics/ioc.py 0.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@                  Coverage Diff                   @@
##           adopt-copier-template      #29   +/-   ##
======================================================
  Coverage                  43.86%   43.86%           
======================================================
  Files                         18       18           
  Lines                        652      652           
======================================================
  Hits                         286      286           
  Misses                       366      366           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Base automatically changed from adopt-copier-template to main April 11, 2024 14:03
This enables demand values to be initialised at start up by
reading from the device without sending demands back down.
This sets an initial value to clear the invalid alarm status that the
records would otherwise have until processed the first time.
@GDYendell GDYendell merged commit 792eae1 into main Apr 11, 2024
15 checks passed
@GDYendell GDYendell deleted the record-initialisation branch April 11, 2024 14:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant