Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Code coverage setup #214

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Feb 9, 2022
Merged

Code coverage setup #214

merged 9 commits into from
Feb 9, 2022

Conversation

t1m0t
Copy link
Contributor

@t1m0t t1m0t commented Feb 6, 2022

Setting up code coverage locally with tarpaulin and adapt ci workflow

@t1m0t t1m0t changed the title local code coverage Code coverage setup Feb 6, 2022
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 6, 2022

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (master@92ec0a4). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master     #214   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage          ?   37.25%           
=========================================
  Files             ?       67           
  Lines             ?     4839           
  Branches          ?        0           
=========================================
  Hits              ?     1803           
  Misses            ?     3036           
  Partials          ?        0           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 92ec0a4...9e4dce2. Read the comment docs.

@t1m0t
Copy link
Contributor Author

t1m0t commented Feb 6, 2022

#185

@jkelleyrtp
Copy link
Member

Is this ready for merge?

@t1m0t
Copy link
Contributor Author

t1m0t commented Feb 9, 2022

There is still a lack of support for wasm so the coverage indicator is not perfect but still it is better than nothing. We should keep track of this issue in another ticket otherwise it is ok for merging imo.

@jkelleyrtp jkelleyrtp merged commit e32337f into DioxusLabs:master Feb 9, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants