Don't take self by value if we don't have to
#498
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
jkelleyrtp
approved these changes
Jul 13, 2023
|
Looks good to me. There's occasionally a performance tradeoff when using references for copy types. https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#/trivially_copy_pass_by_ref We could try turning on clippy pedantic and see if it labels these are small enough to be just plain copied. |
|
Probably not worth it right now and the PR too stale |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Objective
In a lot of functions we currently take
selfby value instead of reference. This is possible because these values areCopy, so we can still comfortably use them.However, this might not always be the case. For example, implementing calculated dimensions will cause them to lose the
Copyderive, breaking several usages.Context
I will probably take another stab at implementing calculated dimensions soon and this PR should make that a bit easier.
There are still 42 errors when removing the
Clonederive fromDimension, but those probably need.clone()to be slapped into several places.See #232 for reference as well.
Feedback wanted
Do you think this could have a performance impact?
I measured some performance regressions in the benchmarks, but they appear to be quite flaky on my machine.
So I'm not sure if it's noise or an actual regression.