write_suppress_pattern can write too-long msg for dr_fprintf #29
Comments
|
From bruen...@google.com on December 10, 2010 17:46:19 Issue 200 has been merged into this issue. |
|
From bruen...@google.com on February 17, 2013 08:27:58 Owner: --- |
This was referenced Nov 28, 2014
Closed
gregcawthorne
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 17, 2021
AArch64 port of drmemory. Only contains slowpath support with shared_slowpath off. Pattern mode and fastpath modes are being worked on separately. Depends on: https://github.com/DynamoRIO/dynamorio/tree/mem-ref-for-clean-calls-aarch64/core Current tests we have analysed: Test project /home/grecaw01/APD-testing/drmem-upstream3/drmemory/build Start 1: drmf_proj 1/49 Test #1: drmf_proj ......................... Passed 0.45 sec Start 2: unit_tests 2/49 Test #2: unit_tests ........................ Passed 0.02 sec Start 3: hello 3/49 Test #3: hello ............................. Passed 3.55 sec Start 4: free 4/49 Test #4: free .............................. Passed 3.67 sec Start 5: malloc 5/49 Test #5: malloc ............................ Passed 3.88 sec Start 6: leak_indirect 6/49 Test #6: leak_indirect ..................... Passed 3.52 sec Start 7: patterns 7/49 Test #7: patterns .......................... Passed 3.93 sec Start 8: free.exitcode 8/49 Test #8: free.exitcode ..................... Passed 3.64 sec Start 9: track_origins 9/49 Test #9: track_origins .....................***Failed 0.34 sec Start 10: free.pattern 10/49 Test #10: free.pattern ......................***Failed 0.35 sec Start 11: malloc.pattern 11/49 Test #11: malloc.pattern ....................***Failed 0.34 sec Start 12: track_origins.pattern 12/49 Test #12: track_origins.pattern .............***Failed 0.34 sec Start 13: fuzz_corpus 13/49 Test #13: fuzz_corpus ....................... Passed 3.56 sec Start 14: fuzz_buffer 14/49 Test #14: fuzz_buffer ....................... Passed 4.62 sec Start 15: fuzz_buffer.replace_buffer 15/49 Test #15: fuzz_buffer.replace_buffer ........ Passed 4.62 sec Start 16: fuzz_buffer.overflow 16/49 Test #16: fuzz_buffer.overflow ..............***Failed 0.34 sec Start 17: fuzz_buffer.mutator.o-b-s-3 17/49 Test #17: fuzz_buffer.mutator.o-b-s-3 ....... Passed 4.59 sec Start 18: fuzz_buffer.mutator.r-b-s-3 18/49 Test #18: fuzz_buffer.mutator.r-b-s-3 ....... Passed 4.63 sec Start 19: fuzz_buffer.mutator.o-b-3 19/49 Test #19: fuzz_buffer.mutator.o-b-3 ......... Passed 4.60 sec Start 20: fuzz_buffer.mutator.r-n 20/49 Test #20: fuzz_buffer.mutator.r-n ........... Passed 4.54 sec Start 21: fuzz_buffer.mutator.random_seed 21/49 Test #21: fuzz_buffer.mutator.random_seed ... Passed 4.57 sec Start 22: fuzz_buffer.one-input 22/49 Test #22: fuzz_buffer.one-input ............. Passed 3.82 sec Start 23: fuzz_buffer.load_input 23/49 Test #23: fuzz_buffer.load_input ............ Passed 3.81 sec Start 24: fuzz_buffer.skip_initial 24/49 Test #24: fuzz_buffer.skip_initial .......... Passed 4.01 sec Start 25: fuzz_buffer.fixed_size 25/49 Test #25: fuzz_buffer.fixed_size ............ Passed 5.36 sec Start 26: fuzz_buffer.offset 26/49 Test #26: fuzz_buffer.offset ................ Passed 5.42 sec Start 27: fuzz_buffer.module_name 27/49 Test #27: fuzz_buffer.module_name ........... Passed 4.58 sec Start 28: fuzz_buffer.dictionary 28/49 Test #28: fuzz_buffer.dictionary ............ Passed 4.20 sec Start 29: fuzz_buffer.cpp 29/49 Test #29: fuzz_buffer.cpp ................... Passed 17.77 sec Start 30: fuzz_custom_mutator 30/49 Test #30: fuzz_custom_mutator ............... Passed 4.57 sec Start 31: drsyscall_test 31/49 Test #31: drsyscall_test .................... Passed 0.22 sec Start 32: strace_test 32/49 Test #32: strace_test ....................... Passed 0.22 sec Start 33: drfuzz_test_empty 33/49 Test #33: drfuzz_test_empty ................. Passed 0.22 sec Start 34: drfuzz_test_mutator 34/49 Test #34: drfuzz_test_mutator ............... Passed 2.38 sec Start 35: drfuzz_test_repeat 35/49 Test #35: drfuzz_test_repeat ................***Failed Start 36: drfuzz_test_segfault 36/49 Test #36: drfuzz_test_segfault .............. Passed 0.20 sec Start 37: drfuzz_test_app_abort 37/49 Test #37: drfuzz_test_app_abort ............. Passed 0.22 sec Start 38: drfuzz_test_no_crash 38/49 Test #38: drfuzz_test_no_crash .............. Passed 0.22 sec Start 39: umbra_test_empty 39/49 Test #39: umbra_test_empty .................. Passed 0.22 sec Start 40: umbra_test_overlap 40/49 Test #40: umbra_test_overlap ................ Passed 0.23 sec Start 41: umbra_test_shadow_mem 41/49 Test #41: umbra_test_shadow_mem ............. Passed 0.30 sec Start 42: umbra_test_insert_app_to_shadow 42/49 Test #42: umbra_test_insert_app_to_shadow ... Passed 0.29 sec Start 43: umbra_test_consistency 43/49 Test #43: umbra_test_consistency ............ Passed 0.30 sec Start 44: umbra_test_allscales 44/49 Test #44: umbra_test_allscales .............. Passed 0.39 sec Start 45: drltrace 45/49 Test #45: drltrace .......................... Passed 0.35 sec Start 46: drltrace_libcalls 46/49 Test #46: drltrace_libcalls ................. Passed 0.36 sec Start 47: drltrace_symargs 47/49 Test #47: drltrace_symargs .................. Passed 0.36 sec Start 48: drltrace_libargs 48/49 Test #48: drltrace_libargs .................. Passed 0.35 sec Start 49: strace_sample 49/49 Test #49: strace_sample ..................... Passed 0.22 sec 88% tests passed, 6 tests failed out of 49
gregcawthorne
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 17, 2021
AArch64 port of drmemory. Only contains slowpath support with shared_slowpath off. Pattern mode and fastpath modes are being worked on separately. Currently this build does break some x86 functionality. Depends on: https://github.com/DynamoRIO/dynamorio/tree/mem-ref-for-clean-calls-aarch64/core Current tests we have analysed: Test project /home/grecaw01/APD-testing/drmem-upstream3/drmemory/build Start 1: drmf_proj 1/49 Test #1: drmf_proj ......................... Passed 0.45 sec Start 2: unit_tests 2/49 Test #2: unit_tests ........................ Passed 0.02 sec Start 3: hello 3/49 Test #3: hello ............................. Passed 3.55 sec Start 4: free 4/49 Test #4: free .............................. Passed 3.67 sec Start 5: malloc 5/49 Test #5: malloc ............................ Passed 3.88 sec Start 6: leak_indirect 6/49 Test #6: leak_indirect ..................... Passed 3.52 sec Start 7: patterns 7/49 Test #7: patterns .......................... Passed 3.93 sec Start 8: free.exitcode 8/49 Test #8: free.exitcode ..................... Passed 3.64 sec Start 9: track_origins 9/49 Test #9: track_origins .....................***Failed 0.34 sec Start 10: free.pattern 10/49 Test #10: free.pattern ......................***Failed 0.35 sec Start 11: malloc.pattern 11/49 Test #11: malloc.pattern ....................***Failed 0.34 sec Start 12: track_origins.pattern 12/49 Test #12: track_origins.pattern .............***Failed 0.34 sec Start 13: fuzz_corpus 13/49 Test #13: fuzz_corpus ....................... Passed 3.56 sec Start 14: fuzz_buffer 14/49 Test #14: fuzz_buffer ....................... Passed 4.62 sec Start 15: fuzz_buffer.replace_buffer 15/49 Test #15: fuzz_buffer.replace_buffer ........ Passed 4.62 sec Start 16: fuzz_buffer.overflow 16/49 Test #16: fuzz_buffer.overflow ..............***Failed 0.34 sec Start 17: fuzz_buffer.mutator.o-b-s-3 17/49 Test #17: fuzz_buffer.mutator.o-b-s-3 ....... Passed 4.59 sec Start 18: fuzz_buffer.mutator.r-b-s-3 18/49 Test #18: fuzz_buffer.mutator.r-b-s-3 ....... Passed 4.63 sec Start 19: fuzz_buffer.mutator.o-b-3 19/49 Test #19: fuzz_buffer.mutator.o-b-3 ......... Passed 4.60 sec Start 20: fuzz_buffer.mutator.r-n 20/49 Test #20: fuzz_buffer.mutator.r-n ........... Passed 4.54 sec Start 21: fuzz_buffer.mutator.random_seed 21/49 Test #21: fuzz_buffer.mutator.random_seed ... Passed 4.57 sec Start 22: fuzz_buffer.one-input 22/49 Test #22: fuzz_buffer.one-input ............. Passed 3.82 sec Start 23: fuzz_buffer.load_input 23/49 Test #23: fuzz_buffer.load_input ............ Passed 3.81 sec Start 24: fuzz_buffer.skip_initial 24/49 Test #24: fuzz_buffer.skip_initial .......... Passed 4.01 sec Start 25: fuzz_buffer.fixed_size 25/49 Test #25: fuzz_buffer.fixed_size ............ Passed 5.36 sec Start 26: fuzz_buffer.offset 26/49 Test #26: fuzz_buffer.offset ................ Passed 5.42 sec Start 27: fuzz_buffer.module_name 27/49 Test #27: fuzz_buffer.module_name ........... Passed 4.58 sec Start 28: fuzz_buffer.dictionary 28/49 Test #28: fuzz_buffer.dictionary ............ Passed 4.20 sec Start 29: fuzz_buffer.cpp 29/49 Test #29: fuzz_buffer.cpp ................... Passed 17.77 sec Start 30: fuzz_custom_mutator 30/49 Test #30: fuzz_custom_mutator ............... Passed 4.57 sec Start 31: drsyscall_test 31/49 Test #31: drsyscall_test .................... Passed 0.22 sec Start 32: strace_test 32/49 Test #32: strace_test ....................... Passed 0.22 sec Start 33: drfuzz_test_empty 33/49 Test #33: drfuzz_test_empty ................. Passed 0.22 sec Start 34: drfuzz_test_mutator 34/49 Test #34: drfuzz_test_mutator ............... Passed 2.38 sec Start 35: drfuzz_test_repeat 35/49 Test #35: drfuzz_test_repeat ................***Failed Start 36: drfuzz_test_segfault 36/49 Test #36: drfuzz_test_segfault .............. Passed 0.20 sec Start 37: drfuzz_test_app_abort 37/49 Test #37: drfuzz_test_app_abort ............. Passed 0.22 sec Start 38: drfuzz_test_no_crash 38/49 Test #38: drfuzz_test_no_crash .............. Passed 0.22 sec Start 39: umbra_test_empty 39/49 Test #39: umbra_test_empty .................. Passed 0.22 sec Start 40: umbra_test_overlap 40/49 Test #40: umbra_test_overlap ................ Passed 0.23 sec Start 41: umbra_test_shadow_mem 41/49 Test #41: umbra_test_shadow_mem ............. Passed 0.30 sec Start 42: umbra_test_insert_app_to_shadow 42/49 Test #42: umbra_test_insert_app_to_shadow ... Passed 0.29 sec Start 43: umbra_test_consistency 43/49 Test #43: umbra_test_consistency ............ Passed 0.30 sec Start 44: umbra_test_allscales 44/49 Test #44: umbra_test_allscales .............. Passed 0.39 sec Start 45: drltrace 45/49 Test #45: drltrace .......................... Passed 0.35 sec Start 46: drltrace_libcalls 46/49 Test #46: drltrace_libcalls ................. Passed 0.36 sec Start 47: drltrace_symargs 47/49 Test #47: drltrace_symargs .................. Passed 0.36 sec Start 48: drltrace_libargs 48/49 Test #48: drltrace_libargs .................. Passed 0.35 sec Start 49: strace_sample 49/49 Test #49: strace_sample ..................... Passed 0.22 sec 88% tests passed, 6 tests failed out of 49
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
From derek.br...@gmail.com on August 18, 2010 16:30:21
this is in the middle of my issue #26 fix, so operator delete was raising unaddr errors, but this could happen w/ any C++ app or other app w/ very long symbol names:
% bin/drmemory.exe -dr e:/derek/dr/win32/exports -dr_debug -batch -- e:/derek/ issue251 /base_unittests.exe --gtest_filter="*.NewFile"
ChildEBP RetAddr
00 228c8a28 1523ccfc ntdll!ZwRaiseHardError+0x12
01 228c8a78 1520eef4 dynamorio!nt_messagebox+0xec [e:\derek\dr\win32\opensource\core\win32\ntdll.c @ 3205]
02 228c8a8c 150dd5b8 dynamorio!debugbox+0x54 [e:\derek\dr\win32\opensource\core\win32\os.c @ 3434]
03 228c8da8 150dd965 dynamorio!notify+0x1d8 [e:\derek\dr\win32\opensource\core\utils.c @ 1852]
04 228c8e14 150dc9a1 dynamorio!report_dynamorio_problem+0x355 [e:\derek\dr\win32\opensource\core\utils.c @ 2066]
05 228c9140 151fd4db dynamorio!do_file_write+0xb1 [e:\derek\dr\win32\opensource\core\utils.c @ 1648]
06 228c9158 100b0e9c dynamorio!dr_fprintf+0x1b [e:\derek\dr\win32\opensource\core\x86\instrument.c @ 2884]
07 228c9258 100b029a drmemorylib!write_suppress_pattern+0xbac [e:\derek\dr\win32\oss-clients\drmemory\drmemory\report.c @ 439]
08 228c9378 100abbbf drmemorylib!on_suppression_list+0x145a [e:\derek\dr\win32\oss-clients\drmemory\drmemory\report.c @ 563]
09 228c95c0 100ab418 drmemorylib!report_error+0x79f [e:\derek\dr\win32\oss-clients\drmemory\drmemory\report.c @ 1132]
0a 228c95ec 1001bfc3 drmemorylib!report_unaddressable_access+0x28 [e:\derek\dr\win32\oss-clients\drmemory\drmemory\report.c @ 1235]
0b 228c9878 10018a9c drmemorylib!handle_mem_ref+0x31c3 [e:\derek\dr\win32\oss-clients\drmemory\drmemory\readwrite.c @ 2769]
0c 228c99d0 1000ecb1 drmemorylib!check_mem_opnd+0x184c [e:\derek\dr\win32\oss-clients\drmemory\drmemory\readwrite.c @ 2536]
0d 228c9f44 2296008f drmemorylib!slow_path+0x1f41 [e:\derek\dr\win32\oss-clients\drmemory\drmemory\readwrite.c @ 1699]
WARNING: Frame IP not in any known module. Following frames may be wrong.
0e 0012fce0 0042e507 0x2296008f
0f 0012fcf0 0042e00b base_unittests!std::allocator<wchar_t>::deallocate+0x17 [c:\program files (x86)\microsoft visual studio 9.0\vc\include\xmemory @ 140]
10 0012fd08 0042dcca base_unittests!std::basic_string<wchar_t,std::char_traits<wchar_t>,std::allocator<wchar_t> >::_Tidy+0x6b [c:\program files (x86)\microsoft visual studio 9.0\vc\include\xstring @ 2158]
11 0012fd1c 004fd5d9 base_unittests!std::basic_string<wchar_t,std::char_traits<wchar_t>,std::allocator<wchar_t> >::
basic_string<wchar_t,std::char_traits<wchar_t>,std::allocator<wchar_t> >+0x1a [c:\program files (x86)\microsoft visual studio 9.0\vc\include\xstring @ 907]_Treestd::_Tmap_traits<std::basic_string<char,std::char_traits<char,std::allocator >,std::basic_string<wchar_t,std::char_traits<wchar_t>,std::allocator<wchar_t> >,std::lessstd::basic_string<char,std::char_traits<char,std::allocator > >,std::allocator<std::pair<std::basic_string<char,s"12 0012fd28 004fd5a9 base_unittests!std::pairstd::basic_string<char,std::char_traits<char,std::allocator > const ,std::basic_string<wchar_t,std::char_traits<wchar_t>,std::allocator<wchar_t> > >::
pairstd::basic_string<char,std::char_traits<char,std::allocator > const ,std::basic_string<wchar_t,std::char_traits<wchar_t>,std::allocator<wchar_t> > >+0x19_Node+0x1913 0012fd34 004fd516 base_unittests!std::_Tree_nodstd::_Tmap_traits<std::basic_string<char,std::char_traits<char,std::allocator >,std::basic_string<wchar_t,std::char_traits<wchar_t>,std::allocator<wchar_t> >,std::lessstd::basic_string<char,std::char_traits<char,std::allocator > >,std::allocatorstd::pair<std::basic_string<char,std::char_traits<char,std::allocator > const ,std::basic_string<wchar_t,std::char_traits<wchar_t>,std::allocator<wchar_t> > > >,0> >::_Node::
0:000> .frame 5
05 228c9140 151fd4db dynamorio!do_file_write+0xb1 [e:\derek\dr\win32\opensource\core\utils.c @ 1648]
0:000> dv
f = 0x00000344
fmt = 0x10149dac "%.*s???"
ap = 0x228c9168 "c???"
size = 0xffffffff
logbuf = char [768] "base_unittests.exe!std::_Treestd::_Tmap_traits<std::basic_string<char,std::char_traits<char,std::allocator >,std::basic_string<wchar_t,std::char_traits<wchar_t>,std::allocator<wchar_t> >,std::lessstd::basic_string<char,std::char_traits<char,std::allocator > >,std::allocatorstd::pair<std::basic_string<char,std::char_traits<char,std::allocator > const ,std::basic_string<wchar_t,std::char_traits<wchar_t>,std::allocator<wchar_t> > > >,0> >::
Original issue: http://code.google.com/p/drmemory/issues/detail?id=29
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: