-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 368
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix bug in array syntax in ice_itd.F90 #400
Merged
singhbalwinder
merged 1 commit into
master
from
susburrows/atm/bugfix-ice_itd-array-syntax
Oct 29, 2015
Merged
Fix bug in array syntax in ice_itd.F90 #400
singhbalwinder
merged 1 commit into
master
from
susburrows/atm/bugfix-ice_itd-array-syntax
Oct 29, 2015
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Fixes an error encountered when compiling with intel DEBUG mode on edison. In this bug, the code fails at runtime in ice_itd.F90 with a message stating: "Subscript #1 of the array ATRCR has value 1 which is greater than the upper bound of 0" This is fixed as described on DiscussCESM (https://bb.cgd.ucar.edu/error-running-compset-fsdwsf-ert), by removing the explicit array syntax in the call to compute_tracers(). Fixes #339
singhbalwinder
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 28, 2015
#400) Fix bug in array syntax in ice_itd.F90 Fixes an error encountered when compiling with intel DEBUG mode on edison. In this bug, the code fails at runtime in ice_itd.F90 with a message stating: "Subscript #1 of the array ATRCR has value 1 which is greater than the upper bound of 0" This is fixed as described on DiscussCESM (https://bb.cgd.ucar.edu/error-running-compset-fsdwsf-ert), by removing the explicit array syntax in the call to compute_tracers(). Fixes #339 [BFB]
Pushed to next. Waiting for nightlies. |
BFB? |
should be BFB. I thought we were only adding a flag if it is non-BFB...? |
Nope, you should always add [BFB] |
OK, @singhbalwinder , can you make sure this is added when you merge to master? thank you... |
Okay. I will do that. |
I just checked and for some reason I have included BFB in my commit to the next branch. |
That's ok as long as its on the master merge commit. |
singhbalwinder
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 29, 2015
Fix bug in array syntax in ice_itd.F90 Fixes an error encountered when compiling with intel DEBUG mode on edison. In this bug, the code fails at runtime in ice_itd.F90 with a message stating: "Subscript #1 of the array ATRCR has value 1 which is greater than the upper bound of 0" This is fixed as described on DiscussCESM (https://bb.cgd.ucar.edu/error-running-compset-fsdwsf-ert), by removing the explicit array syntax in the call to compute_tracers(). Fixes #339 [BFB]
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes an error encountered when compiling with intel DEBUG mode on
edison. In this bug, the code fails at runtime in ice_itd.F90 with a
message stating:
"Subscript #1 of the array ATRCR has value 1 which is greater than the
upper bound of 0"
This is fixed as described on DiscussCESM
(https://bb.cgd.ucar.edu/error-running-compset-fsdwsf-ert), by
removing the explicit array syntax in the call to compute_tracers().
Fixes #339
[BFB]