-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.8k
DAWN-138 ⁃ P2P Network Improvements #291
Comments
I'll bet this in place tonight* (* for some timezone :-) |
In terms of priority:
|
Please refine this into individual tickets and mark the parts that are actually in progress as in progress. |
I've gone through all of the sub-issues and marked them as either done or pending a particular issue number. In a couple of cases I have additional questions and a couple I just feel wont get done in the next day or two. Easy
Stability
Usability
Question: with multiple producer nodes, isn't it alwasys necessary for pending transactions to be communicated to a block producer? or is it sufficient for transactions to be held as pending until it's node becomes the current block producer? Security
Performance
create per-item issues on github and link to issue number. DONE |
updated summary, and added milestone 2 although most of it is ready for M1. |
…ding tasks identified by TODO compiler comments
One more iteration of the P2P action list. In this one I've removed all "DONE" items to highlight just where effort is needed. Usability
Question: with multiple producer nodes, isn't it always necessary for pending transactions to be communicated to a block producer? or is it sufficient for transactions to be held as pending until it's node becomes the current block producer? Security
Performance
|
Do we need multi-threaded network processing at all?
So, if I got it right, is there any need to have multi-threaded network processing? |
This meta issue is complete. |
better cmake and small fix for pair
Cumulative security fixes for 2.0 rc3
Easy
Stability
Usability
Security
Performance
TODO: create per-item issues on github and link to issue number.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: