Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Cleanup] Only link Lua with zone #1288

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 19, 2021
Merged

[Cleanup] Only link Lua with zone #1288

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 19, 2021

Conversation

mackal
Copy link
Member

@mackal mackal commented Mar 7, 2021

Only zone requires to be linked to lua, so let's not link EVERYTHING.

There is probably more clean up we could do, but I know for a fact Lua
is only used by zone.

This probably has some measurable benefits that probably don't really
matter that much :)

Only zone requires to be linked to lua, so let's not link EVERYTHING.

There is probably more clean up we could do, but I know for a fact Lua
is only used by zone.

This probably has some measurable benefits that probably don't really
matter that much :)
@mackal mackal requested a review from KimLS March 7, 2021 03:58
@@ -348,6 +348,8 @@ IF(UNIX)
ENDIF()
ENDIF()

SET(ZONE_LIBS ${ZONE_LIBS} ${SERVER_LIBS})
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I had no issues with this line when lua was disabled. So I think it's fine.

@mackal mackal changed the title Only link Lua with zone [Cleanup] Only link Lua with zone Mar 7, 2021
@Akkadius
Copy link
Member

LGTM; can get @KimLS to take a quick look before merging if you want

@KimLS
Copy link
Member

KimLS commented Mar 19, 2021

Looks good to me.

@Akkadius Akkadius merged commit d202695 into master Mar 19, 2021
@mackal mackal deleted the cleanup/lua_only_zone branch April 14, 2021 02:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants