-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 150
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
part of cam6_3_108: Cloud to ground lightning flash frequency passed to land model #747
Conversation
modified: Externals.cfg modified: bld/build-namelist modified: bld/namelist_files/namelist_definition.xml modified: src/chemistry/mozart/mo_lightning.F90 modified: src/chemistry/pp_none/chemistry.F90 modified: src/control/camsrfexch.F90 modified: src/cpl/nuopc/atm_import_export.F90 modified: src/physics/cam/physpkg.F90
…ash_freq" to "atm_provides_lightning"; minor cleanup modified: bld/build-namelist modified: bld/namelist_files/namelist_definition.xml modified: src/chemistry/mozart/mo_lightning.F90 modified: src/chemistry/pp_none/chemistry.F90 modified: src/control/camsrfexch.F90 modified: src/cpl/nuopc/atm_import_export.F90
modified: src/chemistry/mozart/chemistry.F90 modified: src/chemistry/mozart/mo_chemini.F90 modified: src/chemistry/mozart/mo_lightning.F90 modified: src/chemistry/pp_none/chemistry.F90 modified: src/control/camsrfexch.F90 modified: src/physics/cam/physpkg.F90
modified: bld/build-namelist modified: src/cpl/nuopc/atm_import_export.F90
modified: bld/build-namelist modified: src/chemistry/mozart/mo_lightning.F90
modified: bld/build-namelist modified: bld/namelist_files/namelist_definition.xml modified: src/chemistry/mozart/chemistry.F90 modified: src/chemistry/mozart/mo_chemini.F90 modified: src/chemistry/mozart/mo_lightning.F90 modified: src/control/runtime_opts.F90 modified: src/cpl/nuopc/atm_import_export.F90
modified: src/chemistry/mozart/chemistry.F90 modified: src/chemistry/mozart/mo_chemini.F90 modified: src/chemistry/mozart/mo_lightning.F90 modified: src/chemistry/pp_none/chemistry.F90 modified: src/control/camsrfexch.F90 modified: src/physics/cam/physpkg.F90
modified: src/chemistry/mozart/mo_lightning.F90 modified: src/control/camsrfexch.F90 modified: src/cpl/nuopc/atm_import_export.F90 modified: src/physics/cam_dev/physpkg.F90
|
||
cld2grnd_flash_freq(i) = cam_in(c)%landfrac(i)*flash_freq_land *cgic(i,c) * factor ! cld-to-grnd flash frq (per min) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@lkemmons Does this formulation look correct for the cloud-to-ground lightning flash frequency? Is it correct to include factor
here which is 0.1_r8*lght_no_prd_factor
, the namelist lightning NOx production rate tuning parameter.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No, 'factor' is just for getting the right amount of NO emissions per flash, and should not be applied to the flash frequency that is passed to the land.
modified: bld/build-namelist modified: src/control/camsrfexch.F90
modified: src/chemistry/mozart/mo_lightning.F90
|
||
call addfld( 'LNO_COL_PROD', horiz_only, 'I', 'TG N/YR', 'lightning column NO source' ) | ||
call addfld( 'LNO_PROD', (/ 'lev' /), 'I', '/cm3/s', 'lightning insitu NO source' ) | ||
call addfld( 'FLASHENGY', horiz_only, 'I', 'J', 'lightning flash energy' ) ! flash energy |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@lkemmons What should the units be on the flash energy?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The flash energy is in joules (J).
Could we change LNO_PROD units to 'molecules/cm3/s' - I think that is consistent with other chemical rates?
modified: src/chemistry/mozart/mo_lightning.F90
This PR caught the attention of the LMWG. Thanks for working on this, @fvitt! We're wondering what the timeline for this PR may be, as there's quite a bit of work this could spark on the land side if we can get interactive lightning (and therefore fire ignitions) into CESM3? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Preliminary review - may have additional comments, but wanted to get a couple of questions answered
modified: src/chemistry/mozart/mo_lightning.F90
modified: src/chemistry/mozart/mo_lightning.F90
modified: src/chemistry/mozart/mo_lightning.F90
modified: bld/build-namelist
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good. A couple of minor comments.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good, just have one small change request and a question.
modified: bld/build-namelist
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks Ok to me.
modified: Externals.cfg
modified: src/chemistry/mozart/mo_lightning.F90 modified: src/control/camsrfexch.F90
Closes #567