-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 315
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merge b4bdev 20241125 #2893
Merged
Merged
Merge b4bdev 20241125 #2893
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
git-subtree-dir: .lib/git-fleximod git-subtree-split: 02e859950fd79064ad5b64565ce1073bea5d3ffa
A link that should be to an equation for leaf boundary layer resistance was instead pointing to one for canopy air temperature.
Merge b4b-dev
Merge master 2024 11 09
Remove num_solar and implement coszen filters in UrbanAlbedoMod.F90
run_sys_tests: Print test list in --verbose/--debug
Fix numbering error in CLM50_Tech_Note_Fluxes.rst
50bd54c63 Bump to 0.9.3 1e0c40a46 Merge pull request ESCOMP#66 from ESMCI/poetry_and_test_update 135770709 strip strip e7f9a261c fix issue 65 b1568e724 update poetry certifi version and update tests failing due to mpi-serial update git-subtree-dir: .lib/git-fleximod git-subtree-split: 50bd54c63e38c52e0bfc4a1d6bc6cb0eea6cf645
Update git fleximod
Fates fuel refactor
ekluzek
added
enhancement
new capability or improved behavior of existing capability
code health
improving internal code structure to make easier to maintain (sustainability)
testing
additions or changes to tests
bfb
bit-for-bit
priority: Immediate
Highest priority, something that was unexpected
usability
Improve or clarify user-facing options
labels
Nov 25, 2024
slevis-lmwg
approved these changes
Nov 26, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Approving to unblock Erik.
Testing on Derecho and Izumi is passing as expected. I'm still seeing the mpi-serial nag tests failing at runtime as we did before, even though I had seen it working for cases yesterday. So I'm moving forward with the tag. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
bfb
bit-for-bit
code health
improving internal code structure to make easier to maintain (sustainability)
enhancement
new capability or improved behavior of existing capability
priority: Immediate
Highest priority, something that was unexpected
testing
additions or changes to tests
usability
Improve or clarify user-facing options
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description of changes
Specific notes
Contributors other than yourself, if any: @jedwards4b @olyson @adrifoster @seleneonowe @samsrabin
CTSM Issues Fixed (include github issue #):
Fixes #17 albgrd and albgri history fields depend on decomposition, for urban points
Fixes #747 In UrbanAlbedo: Create a filter for coszen>0 and operate over that
Are answers expected to change (and if so in what way)? No
Any User Interface Changes (namelist or namelist defaults changes)?
Does this create a need to change or add documentation? Did you do so? No No
Testing performed, if any: will run regular testing
So far ran PFUNIT tests, build-namelist tests, and python tests, running aux_clm on Derecho