Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

cime5 lost some functionality in cs.status that was in cimeteststatus #293

Closed
ekluzek opened this issue Jul 25, 2016 · 8 comments
Closed

Comments

@ekluzek
Copy link
Contributor

ekluzek commented Jul 25, 2016

cime5 lost some of the functionality in cs.status that was in the prior cimeteststatus. cimeteststatus was written in python, so adding some of this functionality back might not be that hard to do.

1.) cs.status requires you to cd to test directory

2.) cs.status doesn't allow helpful arguments like help

3.) cs.status doesn't have an option to combine test Id's together or specify a given test ID with a "-i" option

4.) cs.status removes the "-s" summary option, which made it easier to parse for fails

I also think the creation of the bash script for the specific test ID in the test directory is a bit awkward (the cs.status. scripts). Number "3" above is a better handling of this.

@billsacks
Copy link
Member

For:

3.) cs.status doesn't have an option to combine test Id's together or specify a given test ID with a "-i" option

we could just give cs.status an option saying what testid(s) to aggregate over, rather than having a separate cs.status file for each testid.

@ekluzek
Copy link
Contributor Author

ekluzek commented Sep 22, 2016

As a temporary workaround I have a script in CLM (currently on the esmci branch clm4_5_8_r174_esmciport) that replicates the functionality of cimeteststatus. @bandre-ucar. I'll take a look at the cimeteststatus in cime4 and make sure I replicate it's operation.

@fischer-ncar fischer-ncar self-assigned this Sep 26, 2016
@fischer-ncar
Copy link
Contributor

@ekluzek, can you point me to your script in clm4_5_8_r174_esmciport that replicates the functionality.

@ekluzek
Copy link
Contributor Author

ekluzek commented Sep 26, 2016

Yes it's at the top level, above the cime directory. The name starts with
parse.

On Sep 26, 2016 2:48 PM, "fischer-ncar" notifications@github.com wrote:

@ekluzek https://github.com/ekluzek, can you point me to your script in
clm4_5_8_r174_esmciport that replicates the functionality.


You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#293 (comment), or mute
the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ALAswMHh8seYr0EAaC6FC4CpHyQBEwC9ks5quC-HgaJpZM4JUm4A
.

@rljacob
Copy link
Member

rljacob commented Oct 7, 2016

Is this still an issue?

@fischer-ncar
Copy link
Contributor

Yes, I'm still working on it.

@rljacob rljacob removed this from the cesm2 milestone Nov 8, 2016
@rljacob rljacob assigned jgfouca and unassigned fischer-ncar Apr 7, 2017
@rljacob
Copy link
Member

rljacob commented Apr 7, 2017

@fischer-ncar are you still working on this? Would like to assign to @jgfouca .

@fischer-ncar
Copy link
Contributor

I want to be working on it, but haven't had the time. You can go ahead and assign it to @jgfouca.

@ghost ghost added in progress and removed ready labels Apr 16, 2017
@ghost ghost removed the in progress label Apr 17, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants