Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

✨ Allow to chat message based for specific models #81

Closed
mkrueger12 opened this issue Jan 15, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #90
Closed

✨ Allow to chat message based for specific models #81

mkrueger12 opened this issue Jan 15, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #90
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@mkrueger12
Copy link
Contributor

Update Unified Request schema to accept different prompts for different models

@mkrueger12 mkrueger12 self-assigned this Jan 15, 2024
mkrueger12 added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 21, 2024
@mkrueger12 mkrueger12 linked a pull request Jan 21, 2024 that will close this issue
mkrueger12 added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 21, 2024
@roma-glushko roma-glushko changed the title Update Unified Request Schema ✨ Allow to chat message based for specific models Jan 21, 2024
mkrueger12 added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 28, 2024
mkrueger12 added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 28, 2024
* #81: Update request schema so a model can be specified

* #81: Add model field to JSON payload

* #81: refactor getPayload function

* #81: lint

* #81: Refactor Chat function to support message override, add back pointer

* #81: add docs

---------

Co-authored-by: Max <mkrueger190@gmail.com>
roma-glushko added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 31, 2024
## Changelog

### Features

- ✨ #81: Allow to chat message based for specific models (@mkrueger12)

### Improvements

- 🔧 #78: Normalize response latency by response token count (@roma-glushko)
- 📝 #112 added the CLI banner info (@roma-glushko)

### Miscellaneous 

- 📝 #114 Make links actual across the project (@roma-glushko)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants