Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

EXPERIMENTAL: wumbo htlc support #4589

Closed

Conversation

rustyrussell
Copy link
Contributor

Implements lightning/bolts#877

@rustyrussell rustyrussell added protocol These issues are protocol level issues that should be discussed on the protocol spec repo Optech Make Me Famous! Look! Look! Look! COOL NEW FEATURE! labels Jun 8, 2021
@rustyrussell rustyrussell added this to the v0.10.1 milestone Jun 8, 2021
@rustyrussell rustyrussell requested a review from cdecker as a code owner June 8, 2021 00:39
@rustyrussell rustyrussell force-pushed the guilt/wumbo-htlcs branch 2 times, most recently from 61aa5d6 to e878429 Compare June 8, 2021 01:08
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Imported from lightning/bolts#877

Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-EXPERIMENTAL: Protocol: We now negotiate option_wumbo_htlcs, so you can send single HTLCs > 2^32 millisatoshis.
@rustyrussell rustyrussell marked this pull request as draft June 10, 2021 01:42
@rustyrussell rustyrussell removed this from the v0.10.1 milestone Jun 10, 2021
@rustyrussell
Copy link
Contributor Author

We won't have a feature bit it seems: we'll simply wait for electrum to relax its recv-side restriction (since other implementations will send without checking anyway) and once that is widely deployed we'll remove our send-side restriction.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Optech Make Me Famous! Look! Look! Look! COOL NEW FEATURE! protocol These issues are protocol level issues that should be discussed on the protocol spec repo
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant