fix: typo in Coffeescript article

posts/06-30-18/what-coffeescripts-failures-say-about-elm.md

@@ -26,4 +26,4 @@ Since Elm is statically and strictly typed, it makes sense that they need safegu
 
 Elm, Purescript, and Dart all have their own packages managers, elm-package, pursuit, and pub, respectively. While that's fine, it also forgoes npm, which is the largest ecosystem of any language, and I think that's a critical mistake. Unless you have the infrastructure or niche use cases to justify those languages, or the time to implement your own libraries for the problems you might encounter.
 
-To me, it comes off as hubris—in an attempt to guard their ecosystems, they skip out on compatibility with Javascript, which has evolved to be a great language with ES6+. Coffeescript had a lot of good ideas, and some like => syntax found their way into JS proper, and its syntax certainly wasn't enough ot sink it—it was its arrogant, casual detachment from the world of Javascript.
+To me, it comes off as hubris—in an attempt to guard their ecosystems, they skip out on compatibility with Javascript, which has evolved to be a great language with ES6+. Coffeescript had a lot of good ideas, and some like => syntax found their way into JS proper, and its syntax certainly wasn't enough to sink it—it was its arrogant, casual detachment from the world of Javascript.