docs: added basic comparison docs page

[ErikBjare]

Fixes #112

---

Important

Adds comparison.rst to document gptme features and compare it with other AI-assisted development tools.

• Documentation:
  • Adds comparison.rst to provide an overview of gptme and similar AI-assisted development tools.
  • Highlights key features of gptme, such as terminal operation, shell command execution, and extensibility.
  • Compares gptme with alternatives like Open Interpreter, Aider, Moatless Tools, GPT Engineer App, and Cursor.
  • Discusses differences in focus, environment, and capabilities between gptme and other tools.
  • Provides guidance on choosing the right tool based on user needs and preferences.

^{This description was created by for a6f91bd. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.}

[ellipsis-dev]

👍 Looks good to me! Reviewed everything up to a6f91bd in 13 seconds

More details

• Looked at 152 lines of code in 1 files
• Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 3 drafted comments based on config settings.

1. docs/comparison.rst:28

• Draft comment:
  Typo: Change 'which be more what you are looking for' to 'which may be more what you are looking for.'
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50%
  The phrase 'which be more what you are looking for' is grammatically incorrect. It should be 'which may be more what you are looking for.'

2. docs/comparison.rst:84

• Draft comment:
  Avoid using question marks in statements. Consider rephrasing to provide clear differences without uncertainty.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50%
  The question marks in the differences section suggest uncertainty. It's better to provide clear and confident statements.

3. docs/comparison.rst:124

• Draft comment:
  Clarify 'this seems to be it.' Consider rephrasing to specify what 'it' refers to, such as 'Cursor might be the right choice for you.'
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50%
  The phrase 'If you are a VSCode user who doesn't mind using a fork, this seems to be it.' is informal and unclear. It should be more precise about what 'it' refers to.

Workflow ID: wflow_hvFF3E6O8HgUMi6L

---

You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 75.38%. Comparing base (d7cebba) to head (a6f91bd).
Report is 3 commits behind head on master.

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #220      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   75.11%   75.38%   +0.27%     
==========================================
  Files          57       57              
  Lines        3580     3591      +11     
==========================================
+ Hits         2689     2707      +18     
+ Misses        891      884       -7     

Flag	Coverage Δ
anthropic/claude-3-haiku-20240307	74.40% <ø> (+0.27%)	⬆️
openai/gpt-4o-mini	73.87% <ø> (-0.06%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.