-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 179
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
refactor(rag): simplify configuration and initialization #266
Conversation
- Reduce configuration complexity to just an enable flag - Use default paths and collection names - Add initialization state tracking - Improve code organization and documentation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍 Looks good to me! Reviewed everything up to dda0ec5 in 14 seconds
More details
- Looked at
151
lines of code in3
files - Skipped
0
files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
3
drafted comments based on config settings.
1. gptme/tools/rag.py:17
- Draft comment:
Removing configuration options likeindex_path
andcollection
reduces flexibility. Consider allowing overrides for advanced users. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:50%
The PR aims to simplify the configuration and initialization of the RAG tool. However, the removal of configuration options likeindex_path
,collection
, and others might limit flexibility for users who need custom configurations. It's important to ensure that the default values are suitable for most use cases, but also consider providing a way to override them if needed.
2. gptme/tools/rag.py:109
- Draft comment:
Ensure_init_run
is thread-safe if used in a multi-threaded environment. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:50%
The PR introduces a global variable_init_run
to track initialization state. This is a good practice to prevent re-initialization, but it should be ensured that this variable is thread-safe if the code is expected to run in a multi-threaded environment.
3. gptme/tools/_rag_context.py:74
- Draft comment:
Consider allowingindex_path
andcollection
to be configurable for advanced users. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:50%
TheRAGManager
class in_rag_context.py
has hardcoded default values forindex_path
andcollection
. While this simplifies the configuration, it may not be suitable for all users. Consider allowing these to be configurable through environment variables or a separate configuration file.
Workflow ID: wflow_ILqQDWor8sjiBJDE
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet
mode, and more.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #266 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 73.30% 72.37% -0.94%
==========================================
Files 64 64
Lines 4211 4311 +100
==========================================
+ Hits 3087 3120 +33
- Misses 1124 1191 +67
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚨 Try these New Features:
|
Makes RAGManager more flexible by allowing custom index paths and collection names to be specified during initialization, while maintaining backward compatibility with default values. - Added index_path and collection parameters to RAGManager.__init__ - Maintains defaults (~/.cache/gptme/rag and 'default' respectively) - Allows for better testing and customization of RAG functionality
Major refactoring of RAG tests to be more focused and maintainable: - Added reset_rag fixture to ensure clean state between tests - Simplified test cases to focus on core functionality - Removed complex mocking in favor of simpler integration tests - Improved test organization and readability
Required for the new custom index path and collection features in RAGManager.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 8c2b370 in 12 seconds
More details
- Looked at
13
lines of code in1
files - Skipped
1
files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
1
drafted comments based on config settings.
1. pyproject.toml:42
- Draft comment:
The version update forgptme-rag
from^0.2.1
to^0.3.0
is consistent with the PR description and reflects the changes made in the RAG configuration. This is appropriate given the context of the PR. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%
The version update forgptme-rag
from^0.2.1
to^0.3.0
inpyproject.toml
is consistent with the PR description. This change is appropriate given the context of the PR, which aims to simplify configuration and initialization. No issues found here.
Workflow ID: wflow_SD5rmOyP1KLHo247
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet
mode, and more.
Important
Simplifies RAG configuration to a single enable flag, uses default paths, adds initialization tracking, and improves code organization and documentation.
enabled
flag ingptme.toml
.index_path
andcollection
settings, using defaults instead._init_run
flag inrag.py
to track initialization state and prevent redundant initializations._rag_context.py
.rag.py
.rag.py
.This description was created by for 8c2b370. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.