ci: update spike complete automation to try removing dev lifecycle label #8136
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
geospatialem
requested review from
benelan,
jcfranco and
driskull
as code owners
github-actions
bot
added
the
chore
geospatialem
added
skip visual snapshots
geospatialem
deleted the
geospatialem/ci-modify-spike-complete-remove-labels
branch
jcfranco
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 9, 2023
…bel (#8136) **Related Issue:** n/a ## Summary Tries to remove the `2 - in development` lifecycle label, if present on the issue when completing a spike to properly clear all the labels. cc: @jcfranco Refer to #7692 (comment) and #7692 (comment) for additional context.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Related Issue: n/a
Summary
Tries to remove the
2 - in developmentlifecycle label, if present on the issue when completing a spike to properly clear all the labels. cc: @jcfrancoRefer to #7692 (comment) and #7692 (comment) for additional context.