You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, Enclosed JSON - i.e. a file of complete valid Esri REST JSON - is treated as non-splittable; in other words, if used as an input to a MapReduce job, the whole file will be processed by a single Mapper.
It would be possible to skip the opening enclosing brace and the metadata section outside the "features" section, and otherwise the RecordReader could be similar to UnenclosedJsonRecordReader. In fact, if the Enclosed JSON is restricted to the convention of the metadata preceding the "features", likely only small differences from UnenclosedJsonRecordReader would suffice.
Collaborators do not have information as to how much Enclosed JSON is used as MapReduce input. The idea will be set aside, and can potentially pursued if use cases are presented.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently, Enclosed JSON - i.e. a file of complete valid Esri REST JSON - is treated as non-splittable; in other words, if used as an input to a MapReduce job, the whole file will be processed by a single Mapper.
It would be possible to skip the opening enclosing brace and the metadata section outside the "features" section, and otherwise the RecordReader could be similar to
UnenclosedJsonRecordReader
. In fact, if the Enclosed JSON is restricted to the convention of the metadata preceding the "features", likely only small differences fromUnenclosedJsonRecordReader
would suffice.Collaborators do not have information as to how much Enclosed JSON is used as MapReduce input. The idea will be set aside, and can potentially pursued if use cases are presented.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: