Update CoC to add more examples of good/bad conduct #733
Conversation
I am on the CoC WG for AMP and as we move to OpenJS foundation we are going to be adopting this CoC. Which is why we wanted to make some suggestions to make this CoC stronger. Changes made: - Addition of discrimination and sexism as unacceptable behaviors. - Calling out harassment solely and not limiting it to public or private harassment. - Removal of the word project since this CoC is adopted by foundations and projects alike - Addition of gender neutral language as good behaviour. Hope these edits are acceptable. OpenJS issue for reference.
Co-Authored-By: Jordan Harband <ljharb@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: Jordan Harband <ljharb@gmail.com>
|
What's the process on getting these merged? Are we looking for more approvals here? |
|
I’m traveling this week and will be in touch either this weekend or early next week. Thanks for being patient!
|
|
No problem! Just wanted to clarify the procedure going forward! Take your time! |
| @@ -11,15 +11,19 @@ We as members, contributors, and leaders pledge to make participation in our com | |||
|
|
|||
| We pledge to act and interact in ways that contribute to an open, welcoming, diverse, inclusive, and healthy community. | |||
|
|
|||
| We believe that a diverse community where people treat each other with respect is stronger, more vibrant, and has more potential contributors and more sources for ideas. We aim for more diversity. | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
"diverse, welcoming, and inclusive"? Also, please drop "we aim for…" as that seems redundant?
| * Being respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences | ||
| * Giving and gracefully accepting constructive feedback | ||
| * Accepting responsibility and apologizing to those affected by our mistakes, and learning from the experience | ||
| * Focusing on what is best not just for us as individuals, but for the overall community | ||
| * Using inclusive, gender-neutral language in the documents we provide and when we talk to people. When referring to a group of people, we aim to use gender-neutral terms like “team”, “folks”, “everyone”. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The language here feels a bit casual. Would you like to take a pass at making it match more of the rest of the style of the document, or would you rather that I propose new language?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Made some changes inline. Take a look?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
What Language @CoralineAda ? Kindly inform.
|
@CoralineAda pinging for review. |
|
@CoralineAda and I chatted about this offline yesterday. The sense is that these change requests are too community-specific to be upstreamed at this point. The idea behind the Contributor Covenant, as expressed in the text itself ("Adapted from the Contributor Covenant"), is that communities should take ownership of their code of conduct and feel free to adapt it to their own needs. This is what she recommends we do here. I will take this feedback to the OpenJSF CPC today and we'll see how to best address it at the foundation level. |
I am on the CoC WG for AMP and as we move to OpenJS foundation we are going to be adopting this CoC.
Which is why we wanted to make some suggestions to make this CoC stronger.
Changes made:
Hope these edits are acceptable.
OpenJS issue for reference.