-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[HOLD for payment 2023-03-23] [$1000] Inconsistency while selecting dropdown in mWeb and Android #15506
Comments
Triggered auto assignment to @arielgreen ( |
Bug0 Triage Checklist (Main S/O)
|
Reproducible. |
Job added to Upwork: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~010c6b32476cf961bc |
Current assignee @arielgreen is eligible for the External assigner, not assigning anyone new. |
Triggered auto assignment to Contributor-plus team member for initial proposal review - @thesahindia ( |
Triggered auto assignment to @marcaaron ( |
Same issue here. |
ProposalPlease re-state the problem that we are trying to solve in this issue.The Picker component on mobile web and mobile native shows inconsistent behavior in displaying the green bottom border indicator. What is the root cause of that problem?The isOpen state of the Picker component changes the border color, but the events that trigger the state change are different for mobile web and mobile native. The What changes do you think we should make in order to solve the problem?To fix this issue, we need to add additional events to the Picker component to achieve the intended behavior on mobile web. We can disable the green border when a picker item is selected by adding additional logic for changing the android_chrome.mp4As demonstrated above:
What alternative solutions did you explore? (Optional)Another option might be to blur the picker in |
The solution sounds good to me! C+ reviewed 🎀👀🎀 cc: @marcaaron |
Ah, is it me or is it debatable which behavior is correct? The proposal sounds good though I am unsure which is the preferred direction to go here. Would making a selection not return the focus to the field itself? Can native match the behavior that mobile web has? Curious to get @shawnborton's take here. I think we can hire @redstar504 for this one. Though - I would like to get some consensus on the correct behavior first if we can. |
📣 @redstar504 You have been assigned to this job by @marcaaron! |
@marcaaron Thank you. I debated that as well when digging into this. The existing logic seemed to lean towards changing the colour back when the picker is closed. I am not sure it provides much benefit to the user to keep the field highlighted after they have chosen an option and moved on. |
Yeah, this is an interesting one. I think I agree with @redstar504's proposal though to remove the "focus" feeling after something is picked. |
Ok cool sounds good to me. Let's go with the O.G. proposal. Thanks all. |
@thesahindia @daraksha-dk @redstar504 offers sent in Upwork |
@redstar504, @marcaaron, @arielgreen, @thesahindia Whoops! This issue is 2 days overdue. Let's get this updated quick! |
Solution is on staging now - just waiting for it to hit production. |
|
The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 1.2.85-1 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue: If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2023-03-23. 🎊 After the hold period is over and BZ checklist items are completed, please complete any of the applicable payments for this issue, and check them off once done.
As a reminder, here are the bonuses/penalties that should be applied for any External issue:
|
BugZero Checklist: The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:
|
Looks like something related to As a reminder, please make sure that all proposals are not workarounds and that any and all attempt to fix the issue holistically have been made before proceeding with a solution. Proposals to change our Feel free to drop a note in #expensify-open-source with any questions. |
Calculating bonus: $250 to @daraksha-dk Issuing payments now |
@marcaaron @thesahindia please see and complete checklist |
It wasn't a regression so we can skip the first three items. Let's just add the regression steps Regression test proposal
|
👍 |
Excellent, we are good to close then. |
If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email contributors@expensify.com to request to join our Slack channel!
Action Performed:
Expected Result:
Behavior should be consistent.
Actual Result:
The behavior of the field isn't consistent
Workaround:
unknown
Platforms:
Which of our officially supported platforms is this issue occurring on?
Version Number: 1.2.76-7
Reproducible in staging?: y
Reproducible in production?: y
If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from TestRail:
Email or phone of affected tester (no customers):
Logs: https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/4856
Notes/Photos/Videos:
dropdown-test.mp4
az_recorder_20230227_083804.1.mp4
Expensify/Expensify Issue URL:
Issue reported by: @daraksha-dk
Slack conversation: https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C049HHMV9SM/p1677253047142869
View all open jobs on GitHub
Upwork Automation - Do Not Edit
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: