[HOLD for payment 2023-10-25] [$500] Web - The horizontal line separating the header and the messages in the IOU report room disappears and reappears irregularly

[kbecciv]

If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email contributors@expensify.com to request to join our Slack channel!

---

Action Performed:

• You Can open any IOU report room and skip the first two steps

1. Click on the FAB and request Money from any user this will take you to that chat room
2. Click on the IOU message to open the IOU report room
3. Hover over the first Message in the IOU report room and mark it as unread
4. Now notice the unread mark appears and the grey horizontal line still appears
5. leave the the IOU report room and return
6. Notice the horizontal grey line disappears
7. Hover over the first message again and mark it as unread again
8. Now the horizontal grey line appears again

Expected Result:

The unread indicator should be consistently be aligned with the grey bar in IOUs/tasks.

Actual Result:

The horizontal line separating the header and the messages in the IOU report room disappears and reappears irregularly.

Workaround:

Unknown

Platforms:

Which of our officially supported platforms is this issue occurring on?

• Android / native
• Android / Chrome
• iOS / native
• iOS / Safari
• MacOS / Chrome / Safari
• MacOS / Desktop

Version Number: 1.3.61.0
Reproducible in staging?: y
Reproducible in production?: y
If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from TestRail:
Email or phone of affected tester (no customers):
Logs: https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/4856
Notes/Photos/Videos: Any additional supporting documentation

Screencast.from.28-08-23.02_23_41.webm

Recording.4176.mp4

Expensify/Expensify Issue URL:
Issue reported by: @Ahmed-Abdella
Slack conversation: https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C049HHMV9SM/p1693183486459189

View all open jobs on GitHub

Upwork Automation - Do Not Edit

• Upwork Job URL: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~01a365a66bcfc380e7
• Upwork Job ID: 1699177381705969664
• Last Price Increase: 2023-09-05
• Automatic offers:
• Ahmed-Abdella | Reporter | 26638143

[melvin-bot]

Triggered auto assignment to @joekaufmanexpensify (Bug), see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/14418 for more details.

[melvin-bot]

Bug0 Triage Checklist (Main S/O)

• This "bug" occurs on a supported platform (ensure Platforms in OP are ✅)
• This bug is not a duplicate report (check E/App issues and #expensify-bugs)
  • If it is, comment with a link to the original report, close the issue and add any novel details to the original issue instead
• This bug is reproducible using the reproduction steps in the OP. S/O
  • If the reproduction steps are clear and you're unable to reproduce the bug, check with the reporter and QA first, then close the issue.
  • If the reproduction steps aren't clear and you determine the correct steps, please update the OP.
• This issue is filled out as thoroughly and clearly as possible
  • Pay special attention to the title, results, platforms where the bug occurs, and if the bug happens on staging/production.
• I have reviewed and subscribed to the linked Slack conversation to ensure Slack/Github stay in sync

[joekaufmanexpensify]

OOO today, will triage tomorrow!

[joekaufmanexpensify]

The behavior of the unread indicator here is consistent with the rest of the app. We just need to figure out the alignment of the unread bar. This same issue also applies to tasks, we should fix both here.

IMO, we should just change the unread alignment, so the unread indicator consistently matches the grey bar. (This is what we do in regular chat threads).

[joekaufmanexpensify]

Or alternatively, perhaps there shouldn't be margin between the top the first message in the IOU/task room and the grey bar.

[melvin-bot]

Job added to Upwork: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~01a365a66bcfc380e7

[melvin-bot]

Current assignee @joekaufmanexpensify is eligible for the External assigner, not assigning anyone new.

[melvin-bot]

Triggered auto assignment to Contributor-plus team member for initial proposal review - @robertKozik (External)

[zukilover]

Proposal

Please re-state the problem that we are trying to solve in this issue.

The unread indicator should be consistently be aligned with the grey bar in IOUs/tasks.

What is the root cause of that problem?

This is caused by the shouldHideThreadDividerLine flag not being read correctly by ReportActionItem component. We use useCallback to render the item, and the shouldHideThreadDividerLine is evaluated within the callback and not as a dependency. This caused the ReportActionItem to not re-render when it should.

App/src/pages/home/report/ReportActionsList.js

Lines 249 to 250 in 1bdc5ac

	const shouldHideThreadDividerLine = sortedReportActions.length > 1 && sortedReportActions[sortedReportActions.length - 2].reportActionID === currentUnreadMarker.current;

Changing the style so that the unread indicator overlaps the grey line is not the best solution because it's not addressing the underlying problem. Also, the unread indicator has new label on the right that uses transparent background. A portion of the grey line will be exposed if we only use the styling fix.

I propose the following:

Change currentUnreadMarker from useRef to useState so that it triggers re-render when it should.
Change shouldHideThreadDividerLine to useMemo and add it as dependency to the renderItem.

What changes do you think we should make in order to solve the problem?

    const [currentUnreadMarker, setCurrentUnreadMarker] = useState(null);
    const shouldHideThreadDividerLine = useMemo(() => {
        return sortedReportActions.length > 1 && sortedReportActions[sortedReportActions.length - 2].reportActionID === currentUnreadMarker
    }, [sortedReportActions, currentUnreadMarker])

What alternative solutions did you explore? (Optional)

N/A

[joekaufmanexpensify]

Pending review of proposals

[joekaufmanexpensify]

@robertKozik mind taking a look at this proposal when you have a sec?

[robertKozik]

Yeah I'm on it 👀

[robertKozik]

Sorry for keeping you waiting @zukilover, I think your proposal is good, I checked it briefly on my branch and it solved the problem. Let's see it in action!

Selected proposal: Proposal
Contributor: @zukilover

🎀 👀 🎀 C+ reviewed

[melvin-bot]

Triggered auto assignment to @deetergp, see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/7972 for more details.

[joekaufmanexpensify]

Pending internal engineering review.

[joekaufmanexpensify]

@deetergp mind signing off on this proposal when you have a sec?

[deetergp]

I agree with @robertKozik, let's go with @zukilover's proposal 👍

[joekaufmanexpensify]

Catching up on this one now, and is this a correct understanding of where we're at? We had the first PR for this issue, which fixed the bug in some, but not all situations. Now the PR above, is in review, and should fix it in the remaining situations.

Is that right?

[zukilover]

@joekaufmanexpensify that's about right. The original problem has been solved and completed. The new PR is an extended implementation.

[joekaufmanexpensify]

Got it, okay. thanks for confirming

[joekaufmanexpensify]

PR still in review

[melvin-bot]

Based on my calculations, the pull request did not get merged within 3 working days of assignment. Please, check out my computations here:

• when @zukilover got assigned: 2023-09-12 19:08:04 Z
• when the PR got merged: 2023-10-17 19:35:06 UTC
• days elapsed: 25

On to the next one 🚀

[melvin-bot]

Reviewing label has been removed, please complete the "BugZero Checklist".

[melvin-bot]

The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 1.3.86-5 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue:

• Fix unread marker showing double lines on task comment #29314

If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2023-10-25. 🎊

After the hold period is over and BZ checklist items are completed, please complete any of the applicable payments for this issue, and check them off once done.

• External issue reporter
• Contributor that fixed the issue
• Contributor+ that helped on the issue and/or PR

For reference, here are some details about the assignees on this issue:

• @zukilover requires payment
• @robertKozik does not require payment (Contractor)
• @Ahmed-Abdella requires payment offer (Reporter)

As a reminder, here are the bonuses/penalties that should be applied for any External issue:

• Merged PR within 3 business days of assignment - 50% bonus
• Merged PR more than 9 business days after assignment - 50% penalty

[melvin-bot]

BugZero Checklist: The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:

• [@robertKozik] The PR that introduced the bug has been identified. Link to the PR: It had more feature-like vibe, as it was consistent behaviour which needed to be changed ([HOLD for payment 2023-10-25] [$500] Web - The horizontal line separating the header and the messages in the IOU report room disappears and reappears irregularly #26529 (comment))
• [@robertKozik] The offending PR has been commented on, pointing out the bug it caused and why, so the author and reviewers can learn from the mistake. Link to comment: N/A
• [@robertKozik] A discussion in #expensify-bugs has been started about whether any other steps should be taken (e.g. updating the PR review checklist) in order to catch this type of bug sooner. Link to discussion: N/A
• [@robertKozik] Determine if we should create a regression test for this bug.
• [@robertKozik] If we decide to create a regression test for the bug, please propose the regression test steps to ensure the same bug will not reach production again.
• [@joekaufmanexpensify] Link the GH issue for creating/updating the regression test once above steps have been agreed upon: N/A

[joekaufmanexpensify]

@robertKozik mind completing the BZ checklist here so we can prep to close this one?

[robertKozik]

• [@robertKozik] The PR that introduced the bug has been identified. Link to the PR: It had more feature-like vibe, as it was consistent behaviour which needed to be changed (context)
• [@robertKozik] The offending PR has been commented on, pointing out the bug it caused and why, so the author and reviewers can learn from the mistake. Link to comment: N/A
• [@robertKozik] A discussion in #expensify-bugs has been started about whether any other steps should be taken (e.g. updating the PR review checklist) in order to catch this type of bug sooner. Link to discussion: N/A
• [@robertKozik] Determine if we should create a regression test for this bug. I think we don't need it for this one
• [@robertKozik] If we decide to create a regression test for the bug, please propose the regression test steps to ensure the same bug will not reach production again. N/A

[joekaufmanexpensify]

Great, ty!

[joekaufmanexpensify]

BZ checklist is complete, so we need to now issue payment. Here's a summary of payments:

• @zukilover - $500 for PR. Paid via Upwork.
• @Ahmed-Abdella $50 for reporting. Paid via upwork.
• @robertKozik - payment for C+ handled separately.

[joekaufmanexpensify]

@zukilover your $500 was already previously paid out from when you submitted your work for approval in Upwork. I ended your contract!

[joekaufmanexpensify]

@Ahmed-Abdella $50 sent and contract ended!

[joekaufmanexpensify]

Also noting that the initial PR was completed in less than 9 days, which is why no urgency penalty applied here. We later than decided to do a second clean up PR, which was also merged in less than 9 days.

[joekaufmanexpensify]

Bug is fixed, BZ checklist complete, and all payment issued. Closing as this is all set. Thanks everyone!