[HOLD #37199][$500] Remove members out of a workspace are not crossed out in offline mode

[m-natarajan]

If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email contributors@expensify.com to request to join our Slack channel!

---

Version Number: 1.4.43-3
Reproducible in staging?: y
Reproducible in production?: n
If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from TestRail:
Email or phone of affected tester (no customers):
Logs: https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/4856
Expensify/Expensify Issue URL:
Issue reported by: @hoangzinh
Slack conversation: https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C049HHMV9SM/p1708519808525439

Action Performed:

1. Go to Settings -> Workspace -> Open any WS -> Members
2. Invite several members
3. Turn off the internet connection
4. Remove WS members

Expected Result:

Removed members should be strike out

Actual Result:

Notice that members are disappearing instead of crossed out.

Workaround:

unknown

Platforms:

Which of our officially supported platforms is this issue occurring on?

• Android: Native
• Android: mWeb Chrome
• iOS: Native
• iOS: mWeb Safari
• MacOS: Chrome / Safari
• MacOS: Desktop

Screenshots/Videos

Add any screenshot/video evidence

Screen.Recording.2024-02-21.at.19.49.26.mov

Recording.2761.mp4

View all open jobs on GitHub

Upwork Automation - Do Not Edit

• Upwork Job URL: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~016f83f55225363e92
• Upwork Job ID: 1760776518388736000
• Last Price Increase: 2024-02-22
• Automatic offers:
• mkhutornyi | Contributor | 0

[melvin-bot]

Job added to Upwork: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~016f83f55225363e92

[melvin-bot]

Triggered auto assignment to Contributor-plus team member for initial proposal review - @parasharrajat (External)

[melvin-bot]

Triggered auto assignment to @MitchExpensify (Bug), see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/14418 for more details.

[github-actions]

👋 Friendly reminder that deploy blockers are time-sensitive ⏱ issues! Check out the open `StagingDeployCash` deploy checklist to see the list of PRs included in this release, then work quickly to do one of the following:

1. Identify the pull request that introduced this issue and revert it.
2. Find someone who can quickly fix the issue.
3. Fix the issue yourself.

[melvin-bot]

Triggered auto assignment to @francoisl (Engineering), see https://stackoverflowteams.com/c/expensify/questions/9980/ for more details.

[mkhutornyi]

Proposal

Please re-state the problem that we are trying to solve in this issue.

Offline removed members are not visible

What is the root cause of that problem?

App/src/components/SelectionList/BaseListItem.tsx

Lines 58 to 66 in 437d75c

	hoverDimmingValue={1}
	hoverStyle={styles.hoveredComponentBG}
	dataSet={{[CONST.SELECTION_SCRAPER_HIDDEN_ELEMENT]: true}}
	onMouseDown={shouldPreventDefaultFocusOnSelectRow ? (e) => e.preventDefault() : undefined}
	nativeID={keyForList}
	style={pressableStyle}
	>
	{({hovered}) => (
	<>

In #36403, they changed child of PressableWithFeedback from component (<View />) to function (() => <View />) to get hovered value.
This causes applyStrikeThrough not work in OfflineWithFeedback

What changes do you think we should make in order to solve the problem?

Change wrapping order like this:

<PressableWithFeedback>
    {hovered =>
        <OfflineWithFeedback>
                ...
        </OfflineWithFeedback>
    }
</PressableWithFeedback>

This is exactly the same root cause as #35702 (comment)

[francoisl]

Yeah good catch, tested locally and it works well. Feel free to submit a PR plese @mkhutornyi.

[melvin-bot]

📣 @mkhutornyi 🎉 An offer has been automatically sent to your Upwork account for the Contributor role 🎉 Thanks for contributing to the Expensify app!

Offer link
Upwork job
Please accept the offer and leave a comment on the Github issue letting us know when we can expect a PR to be ready for review 🧑‍💻
Keep in mind: Code of Conduct | Contributing 📖

[mkhutornyi]

Thanks. Raising PR shortly

[mkhutornyi]

Looks like there's another regression happening on main. Caused by #37000
Text is not crossed out on native.
@francoisl Can this be out of scope or should be fixed here?

[francoisl]

Do you see a way to fix that regression? If you do, that's great and let's fix it too, otherwise we can put a comment in the PR to fix it later. Not a huge deal since that PR is not on staging yet.

[mkhutornyi]

#37000 was kind of huge refactor and I see that it's not straight forward fix.
As it's less severe bug, I think it's better to let author fix it.

[francoisl]

Works for me.

[mkhutornyi]

I commented on offending line - https://github.com/Expensify/App/pull/37000/files#r1500067904

[luacmartins]

This is known #37074 (comment) and will be fixed when we update the remove functionality next

[luacmartins]

Removing blocker label. I was gonna close the issue, but I see that we already have a PR up to fix it, so I'll let it go through.

[melvin-bot]

⚠️ Looks like this issue was linked to a Deploy Blocker here

If you are the assigned CME please investigate whether the linked PR caused a regression and leave a comment with the results.

If a regression has occurred and you are the assigned CM follow the instructions here.

If this regression could have been avoided please consider also proposing a recommendation to the PR checklist so that we can avoid it in the future.

[mkhutornyi]

@francoisl based on #37235 (comment), should I continue my PR or will be handled while implementing the remove functionality in Simplified Collect?

[burczu]

@mkhutornyi I've already addressed this issue in my PR regarding removing members on the members page (as stated in the mentioned comment): #37199 - it's still in draft state but it will be published tomorrow.

[mkhutornyi]

@burczu I checked your PR but solution is same as mine.
Please consider @parasharrajat's concern here.

[mkhutornyi]

Ideally, can we fix this in OfflineWithFeedback? So that function as child would work with strikethrough.
I'm concerned similar issue might happen in the future.
This is already 2nd bug. 1st bug was #35702

[parasharrajat]

let's find a universal solution. It is not good to tackle this problem case by case.

[MitchExpensify]

Should we close seeing as this is going to be fixed here #37074 (comment) and we don't have a universal solution identified yet - What do you think @parasharrajat ?

[parasharrajat]

I think we can.

[burczu]

Ideally, can we fix this in OfflineWithFeedback? So that function as child would work with strikethrough. I'm concerned similar issue might happen in the future. This is already 2nd bug. 1st bug was #35702

Yeah - I'm working on this right now. Thanks for pointing this out.

[parasharrajat]

@MitchExpensify Could you please put this issue on HOLD for #37199 or close this it?

[luacmartins]

done

[parasharrajat]

@MitchExpensify This issue is resolved. Please close it and its related job on upwork. I am unsure if any payment is pending or if the contributor was already paid.

• Contributor created the PR and was hired.
• During review, I found out that a better solution was being implemented in a new PR so we held the issue.

[parasharrajat]

Bump @MitchExpensify

[MitchExpensify]

Thanks @parasharrajat, let's close. I don't think any payment is due as nothing was ever merged but please let me know if anyone disagrees